[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/lnl: Remove watchdog timers for PSR
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Oct 9 14:57:32 UTC 2023
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:13:03PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> Currently we are not using watchdog timers for PSR/PSR2
> with Lunarlake. The patch removes the use of these timers
> from the driver code.
That still doesn't seem to say that the timers were removed
from the hardware. Or at least I can't parse it that way.
>
> BSpec: 69895
>
> v2: Reword commit message (Ville)
> Drop HPD mask from LNL (Ville)
That should probably be a separate patch since it has nothing to do
with what the commit message is saying.
> Revise masking logic (Jouni)
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 850b11f20285..abdafd04d8e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -676,7 +676,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> val |= EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAMES(psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
>
> - val |= EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME(max_sleep_time);
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 20)
> + val |= EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME(max_sleep_time);
> +
> if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
>
> @@ -1399,9 +1401,11 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> * can rely on frontbuffer tracking.
> */
> mask = EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> - EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> - EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> - EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP;
> + EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP;
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 20)
> + mask |= EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> + EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP;
>
> /*
> * No separate pipe reg write mask on hsw/bdw, so have to unmask all
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list