[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Define and use GuC and CTB TLB invalidation routines (rev2)
John Harrison
john.c.harrison at intel.com
Thu Oct 12 18:06:12 UTC 2023
On 10/12/2023 06:45, Patchwork wrote:
> Project List - Patchwork *Patch Details*
> *Series:* drm/i915: Define and use GuC and CTB TLB invalidation
> routines (rev2)
> *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/125002/
> *State:* failure
> *Details:*
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/index.html
>
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13746 -> Patchwork_125002v2
>
>
> Summary
>
> *FAILURE*
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_125002v2 absolutely need
> to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_125002v2, please notify your bug team
> (lgci.bug.filing at intel.com) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives
> in CI.
>
> External URL:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/index.html
>
>
> Participating hosts (38 -> 38)
>
> Additional (1): fi-bsw-n3050
> Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m
>
>
> Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_125002v2:
>
>
> IGT changes
>
>
> Possible regressions
>
> *
>
> igt at i915_selftest@live at gt_mocs:
>
> o bat-mtlp-8: PASS
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13746/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html>
> -> DMESG-WARN
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_mocs.html>
> +1 other test dmesg-warn
> *
>
> igt at i915_selftest@live at guc:
>
> o
>
> bat-mtlp-6: PASS
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13746/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc.html>
> -> DMESG-WARN
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/bat-mtlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc.html>
> +3 other tests dmesg-warn
>
> o
>
> bat-mtlp-8: NOTRUN -> DMESG-WARN
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_125002v2/bat-mtlp-8/igt@i915_selftest@live@guc.html>
> +1 other test dmesg-warn
>
These failure all appear to be reset related. However, they are full GT
reset not individual engine resets. So not sure they can be explained by
the worker thread vs interrupt handler processing issue of the
gem_exec_capture failures.
I would definitely recommend running these locally when you have the
next version of the patch set ready.
John.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20231012/38fc8c63/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list