[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mtl: Add Wa_14019821291
Matt Roper
matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Wed Oct 18 22:08:47 UTC 2023
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:34:43PM +0530, Dnyaneshwar Bhadane wrote:
> This workaround is primarily implemented by the BIOS. However if the
> BIOS applies the workaround it will reserve a small piece of our DSM
> (which should be at the top, right below the WOPCM); we just need to
> keep that region reserved so that nothing else attempts to re-use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
> index 1a766d8e7cce..b2bc5aab88d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
> @@ -409,6 +409,24 @@ static void icl_get_stolen_reserved(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> *base -= *size;
> else
> *base = reg_val & GEN11_STOLEN_RESERVED_ADDR_MASK;
> +
> + /* Wa_14019821291*/
> + if (IS_MEDIA_GT_IP_STEP(i915->media_gt, IP_VER(13, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_C0)) {
When I check the workaround database I don't see this going away on C0
stepping. It's just listed as a permanent workaround that applies to
all steppings as far as I can see. So just
if (MEDIA_VER_FULL(i915) == IP_VER(13, 0))
should be sufficient.
> + /*
> + * This workaround is primarily implemented by the BIOS. We
> + * just need to figure out whether the BIOS has applied the
> + * workaround (meaning the programmed address falls within
> + * the DSM) and, if so, reserve that part of the DSM to
> + * prevent accidental reuse. The DSM location should be just
> + * below the WOPCM.
> + */
> +
> + u64 gscpsmi_base = intel_uncore_read64_2x32(uncore,
> + MTL_GSCPSMI_BASEADDR_LSB,
> + MTL_GSCPSMI_BASEADDR_MSB);
> + if (gscpsmi_base >= *base && gscpsmi_base < *base + *size)
> + *size = gscpsmi_base - *base;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 135e8d8dbdf0..31d0692a5620 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -6399,5 +6399,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> #define MTL_TRDPRE_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
>
> #define MTL_MEDIA_GSI_BASE 0x380000
> +#define MTL_GSCPSMI_BASEADDR_LSB _MMIO(MTL_MEDIA_GSI_BASE + 0x880c)
> +#define MTL_GSCPSMI_BASEADDR_MSB _MMIO(MTL_MEDIA_GSI_BASE + 0x8810)
There's no need to manually add MTL_MEDIA_GSI_BASE into the register
offset; the intel_uncore_* functions take care of doing that
automatically when you read/write the register. Just _MMIO(0x88xx) is
sufficient.
Also, since these are GT registers, they should probably be in
gt/intel_gt_regs.h instead of this header.
Matt
>
> #endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list