[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/i915/gt: add selftest to exercise WABB
Nirmoy Das
nirmoy.das at linux.intel.com
Tue Oct 24 08:19:55 UTC 2023
Hi Andrzej,
On 10/23/2023 10:21 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Test re-uses logic form indirect ctx BB selftest.
>
> Co-developed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at intel.com>
You can remove above and add my Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das
<nirmoy.das at intel.com> for this patch.
Co-developed-by should be followed by a signed-off. Same for the
previous patch.
Regards,
Nirmoy
> Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> index 5f826b6dcf5d6f..e17b8777d21dc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> @@ -1555,7 +1555,7 @@ static int live_lrc_isolation(void *arg)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int indirect_ctx_submit_req(struct intel_context *ce)
> +static int wabb_ctx_submit_req(struct intel_context *ce)
> {
> struct i915_request *rq;
> int err = 0;
> @@ -1579,7 +1579,8 @@ static int indirect_ctx_submit_req(struct intel_context *ce)
> #define CTX_BB_CANARY_INDEX (CTX_BB_CANARY_OFFSET / sizeof(u32))
>
> static u32 *
> -emit_indirect_ctx_bb_canary(const struct intel_context *ce, u32 *cs)
> +emit_wabb_ctx_canary(const struct intel_context *ce,
> + u32 *cs, bool per_ctx)
> {
> *cs++ = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8 |
> MI_SRM_LRM_GLOBAL_GTT |
> @@ -1587,26 +1588,43 @@ emit_indirect_ctx_bb_canary(const struct intel_context *ce, u32 *cs)
> *cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_START(0));
> *cs++ = i915_ggtt_offset(ce->state) +
> context_wa_bb_offset(ce) +
> - CTX_BB_CANARY_OFFSET;
> + CTX_BB_CANARY_OFFSET +
> + (per_ctx ? PAGE_SIZE : 0);
> *cs++ = 0;
>
> return cs;
> }
>
> +static u32 *
> +emit_indirect_ctx_bb_canary(const struct intel_context *ce, u32 *cs)
> +{
> + return emit_wabb_ctx_canary(ce, cs, false);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 *
> +emit_per_ctx_bb_canary(const struct intel_context *ce, u32 *cs)
> +{
> + return emit_wabb_ctx_canary(ce, cs, true);
> +}
> +
> static void
> -indirect_ctx_bb_setup(struct intel_context *ce)
> +wabb_ctx_setup(struct intel_context *ce, bool per_ctx)
> {
> - u32 *cs = context_indirect_bb(ce);
> + u32 *cs = context_wabb(ce, per_ctx);
>
> cs[CTX_BB_CANARY_INDEX] = 0xdeadf00d;
>
> - setup_indirect_ctx_bb(ce, ce->engine, emit_indirect_ctx_bb_canary);
> + if (per_ctx)
> + setup_per_ctx_bb(ce, ce->engine, emit_per_ctx_bb_canary);
> + else
> + setup_indirect_ctx_bb(ce, ce->engine, emit_indirect_ctx_bb_canary);
> }
>
> -static bool check_ring_start(struct intel_context *ce)
> +static bool check_ring_start(struct intel_context *ce, bool per_ctx)
> {
> const u32 * const ctx_bb = (void *)(ce->lrc_reg_state) -
> - LRC_STATE_OFFSET + context_wa_bb_offset(ce);
> + LRC_STATE_OFFSET + context_wa_bb_offset(ce) +
> + (per_ctx ? PAGE_SIZE : 0);
>
> if (ctx_bb[CTX_BB_CANARY_INDEX] == ce->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_START])
> return true;
> @@ -1618,21 +1636,21 @@ static bool check_ring_start(struct intel_context *ce)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static int indirect_ctx_bb_check(struct intel_context *ce)
> +static int wabb_ctx_check(struct intel_context *ce, bool per_ctx)
> {
> int err;
>
> - err = indirect_ctx_submit_req(ce);
> + err = wabb_ctx_submit_req(ce);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - if (!check_ring_start(ce))
> + if (!check_ring_start(ce, per_ctx))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int __live_lrc_indirect_ctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +static int __lrc_wabb_ctx(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, bool per_ctx)
> {
> struct intel_context *a, *b;
> int err;
> @@ -1667,14 +1685,14 @@ static int __live_lrc_indirect_ctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> * As ring start is restored apriori of starting the indirect ctx bb and
> * as it will be different for each context, it fits to this purpose.
> */
> - indirect_ctx_bb_setup(a);
> - indirect_ctx_bb_setup(b);
> + wabb_ctx_setup(a, per_ctx);
> + wabb_ctx_setup(b, per_ctx);
>
> - err = indirect_ctx_bb_check(a);
> + err = wabb_ctx_check(a, per_ctx);
> if (err)
> goto unpin_b;
>
> - err = indirect_ctx_bb_check(b);
> + err = wabb_ctx_check(b, per_ctx);
>
> unpin_b:
> intel_context_unpin(b);
> @@ -1688,7 +1706,7 @@ static int __live_lrc_indirect_ctx_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int live_lrc_indirect_ctx_bb(void *arg)
> +static int lrc_wabb_ctx(void *arg, bool per_ctx)
> {
> struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> @@ -1697,7 +1715,7 @@ static int live_lrc_indirect_ctx_bb(void *arg)
>
> for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
> intel_engine_pm_get(engine);
> - err = __live_lrc_indirect_ctx_bb(engine);
> + err = __lrc_wabb_ctx(engine, per_ctx);
> intel_engine_pm_put(engine);
>
> if (igt_flush_test(gt->i915))
> @@ -1710,6 +1728,16 @@ static int live_lrc_indirect_ctx_bb(void *arg)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int live_lrc_indirect_ctx_bb(void *arg)
> +{
> + return lrc_wabb_ctx(arg, false);
> +}
> +
> +static int live_lrc_per_ctx_bb(void *arg)
> +{
> + return lrc_wabb_ctx(arg, true);
> +}
> +
> static void garbage_reset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> struct i915_request *rq)
> {
> @@ -1947,6 +1975,7 @@ int intel_lrc_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> SUBTEST(live_lrc_garbage),
> SUBTEST(live_pphwsp_runtime),
> SUBTEST(live_lrc_indirect_ctx_bb),
> + SUBTEST(live_lrc_per_ctx_bb),
> };
>
> if (!HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(i915))
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list