[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Run relevant bits of debugfs drop_caches per GT
Andi Shyti
andi.shyti at linux.intel.com
Thu Sep 7 12:58:08 UTC 2023
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Walk all GTs when doing the respective bits of drop_caches work.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
---
Hi,
I'm proposing this new version of the series I sent here[*].
Patch 1 from that series is not necessary so taht I'm going to
propose the original version proposed by Tvrtko when we were
young.
Andi
Changelog
=========
v2 -> v3:
- fix the "for_each_gt()" parameter order.
v1 -> v2:
- drop the gt idling and the cache flushing decoupling and stick
to the original version.
[*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/123301/
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 7a90a2e32c9f1..e9b79c2c37d84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -740,15 +740,19 @@ static int
i915_drop_caches_set(void *data, u64 val)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = data;
+ struct intel_gt *gt;
unsigned int flags;
+ unsigned int i;
int ret;
drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Dropping caches: 0x%08llx [0x%08llx]\n",
val, val & DROP_ALL);
- ret = gt_drop_caches(to_gt(i915), val);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ for_each_gt(gt, i915, i) {
+ ret = gt_drop_caches(gt, val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
flags = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
--
2.40.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list