[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active

[Umesh Nerlige Ramappa]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:37:53AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
>   Patch Details
>
>Series:  i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active
>URL:     [1]https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/123744/
>State:   failure
>Details: [2]https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_123744v1/index.html
>
>          CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13635 -> Patchwork_123744v1
>
>Summary
>
>   FAILURE
>
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_123744v1 absolutely need to
>   be
>   verified manually.
>
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_123744v1, please notify your bug team
>   (lgci.bug.filing at intel.com) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
>   CI.
>
>   External URL:
>   https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_123744v1/index.html
>
>Participating hosts (40 -> 40)
>
>   Additional (1): fi-kbl-soraka
>   Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m
>
>Possible new issues
>
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
>   Patchwork_123744v1:
>
>  IGT changes
>
>    Possible regressions
>
>     * igt at i915_selftest@live at hangcheck:
>
>          * fi-skl-guc: [3]PASS -> [4]DMESG-FAIL

Not related to changes in this patch. Ran the test a couple times on MTL 
and not seeing any failures.

>
>     * igt at i915_selftest@live at perf:
>
>          * fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [5]ABORT

Unrelated since this does not use GuC.

Umesh

>
>Known issues
>