[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Ignore set frontbuffer return value on release
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Wed Sep 27 14:09:38 UTC 2023
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 01:27:07PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> i915_gem_object_set_frontbuffer returns set frontbuffer pointer.
> When we are releasing frontbuffer we are clearing the pointer from
> the object and the value can be ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c
> index d5540c739404..8ef0538813da 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void frontbuffer_release(struct kref *ref)
>
> i915_ggtt_clear_scanout(obj);
>
> - i915_gem_object_set_frontbuffer(obj, NULL);
> + (void)i915_gem_object_set_frontbuffer(obj, NULL);
should we create a dedicated function for cleaning up task only?
or maybe should we at least print some drm_err or drm_warn if return
is not what we expect?
> spin_unlock(&intel_bo_to_i915(obj)->display.fb_tracking.lock);
>
> i915_active_fini(&front->write);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list