[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 2/4] drm/i915: Introduce the intel_gt_resume_early()

[Nirmoy Das]

Hi Andi,

On 9/28/2023 9:24 AM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Nirmoy,
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:03:55PM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>> Move early resume functions of gt to a proper file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c | 6 ++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h | 1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c    | 6 ++----
>>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
>> index 5a942af0a14e..dab73980c9f1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.c
>> @@ -216,6 +216,12 @@ void intel_gt_pm_fini(struct intel_gt *gt)
>>   	intel_rc6_fini(&gt->rc6);
>>   }
>>   
>> +void intel_gt_resume_early(struct intel_gt *gt)
>> +{
>> +	intel_uncore_resume_early(gt->uncore);
>> +	intel_gt_check_and_clear_faults(gt);
>> +}
>> +
> should this go into the gt/ directory?


Don't wanted to add anything new to i915_driver which can be done at 
lower levels as suggested by Jani and this seems like it

should go to gt dir.

> Besides, if we don't need
> spinlocks in the whole reset function, we could directly have the
>
>     intel_uncore_write_fw(gt->uncore, MTL_STEER_SEMAPHORE, 0x1);
>
> here, so that we avoid having one line functions.

I think steer specific functions should stay in one file/header.


Thanks,

Nirmoy


>
> Andi