[PATCH v17 0/9] Enable Adaptive Sync SDP Support for DP

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024, Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 03:35:55PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Apr 2024, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com> wrote:
>> > On 3/19/2024 3:16 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 04:37:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024, Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani at intel.com> wrote:
>> >>>>   An Adaptive-Sync-capable DP protocol converter indicates its
>> >>>> support by setting the related bit in the DPCD register. This
>> >>>> is valid for DP and edp as well.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Computes AS SDP values based on the display configuration,
>> >>>> ensuring proper handling of Variable Refresh Rate (VRR)
>> >>>> in the context of Adaptive Sync.
>> >>> [snip]
>> >>>
>> >>>> Mitul Golani (9):
>> >>>>    drm/dp: Add support to indicate if sink supports AS SDP
>> >>>>    drm: Add Adaptive Sync SDP logging
>> >>> Maarten, Maxime, Thomas, ack for merging these two patches via
>> >>> drm-intel-next?
>> >> Ack
>> >>
>> >> Maxime
>> >
>> > Thanks for the patch, ack and reviews, pushed to drm-intel-next.
>> 
>> This came up again today [1]. The acks absolutely must be recorded in
>> the commit messages when pushing the patches.
>> 
>> dim should complain about applying non-i915 patches without acks.
>
> It doesn't at the moment, this has bitten us a couple of times in
> drm-misc too.

See check_maintainer() that gets called from apply_patch() and
dim_b4_shazam_branch().

It's of limited value, but it should complain while applying non-i915
patches.

> I did a MR to address that that hasn't been reviewed yet:
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/maintainer-tools/-/merge_requests/40

Yeah, a more generic solution is needed, but I think we should unify
with the above.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel