[PATCH v7 06/11] drm/i915/psr: Modify intel_dp_get_su_granularity to support panel replay
Hogander, Jouni
jouni.hogander at intel.com
Mon Apr 29 11:46:49 UTC 2024
On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 11:45 +0000, Manna, Animesh wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Manna, Animesh
> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2024 5:04 PM
> > To: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogander at intel.com>; intel-
> > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 06/11] drm/i915/psr: Modify
> > intel_dp_get_su_granularity to support panel replay
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2024 4:46 PM
> > > To: Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna at intel.com>; intel-
> > > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] drm/i915/psr: Modify
> > > intel_dp_get_su_granularity to support panel replay
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 11:02 +0000, Manna, Animesh wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 5:42 PM
> > > > > To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > Cc: Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna at intel.com>; Hogander, Jouni
> > > > > <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH v7 06/11] drm/i915/psr: Modify
> > > > > intel_dp_get_su_granularity to support panel replay
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently intel_dp_get_su_granularity doesn't support panel
> > > > > replay.
> > > > > This fix modifies it to support panel replay as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > v2: rely on PSR definitions on common bits
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 62
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > > index b94f8e33ed1f..29400fac13c2 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > > @@ -466,6 +466,40 @@ static u8
> > > > > intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct
> > > > > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > > return val;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static u8 intel_dp_get_su_capability(struct intel_dp
> > > > > *intel_dp) {
> > > > > + u8 su_capability;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (intel_dp->psr.sink_panel_replay_su_support)
> > > >
> > > > While relooking found that good to add a check for
> > > > DP_PANEL_PANEL_REPLAY_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED (6th bit of dpcd
> > > 0xb1).
> > > > What if it is zero means granularity not needed but will
> > > > continue to
> > > > use x-granularity and y-granularity.
> > >
> > > Please note it is 5th bit in 0xb1. See my further comment
> > > below...
> >
> > Same I was referring, 6th bit index 5 as it starts from 0.
> >
> > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Animesh
> > > >
> > > > > + drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > > > +
> > > > > DP_PANEL_PANEL_REPLAY_X_GRANULARITY,
> > > > > + &su_capability, 1);
>
> I think instead of DP_PANEL_PANEL_REPLAY_X_GRANULARITY it should be
> DP_PANEL_PANEL_REPLAY_CAPABILITY, everything else will be fine.
Yes. Just noticed that as well. Good catch here. I will update my set.
BR,
Jouni Högander
>
> Regards,
> Animesh
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + su_capability = intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1];
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return su_capability;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static unsigned int
> > > > > +intel_dp_get_su_x_granularity_offset(struct intel_dp
> > > > > *intel_dp) {
> > > > > + return intel_dp->psr.sink_panel_replay_su_support ?
> > > > > + DP_PANEL_PANEL_REPLAY_X_GRANULARITY :
> > > > > + DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY; }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static unsigned int
> > > > > +intel_dp_get_su_y_granularity_offset(struct intel_dp
> > > > > *intel_dp) {
> > > > > + return intel_dp->psr.sink_panel_replay_su_support ?
> > > > > + DP_PANEL_PANEL_REPLAY_Y_GRANULARITY :
> > > > > + DP_PSR2_SU_Y_GRANULARITY; }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * Note: Bits related to granularity are same in panel
> > > > > replay and
> > > > > psr
> > > > > + * registers. Rely on PSR definitions on these "common"
> > > > > bits.
> > > > > + */
> > >
> > > Check this comment. See my further comment below...
> >
> > Agree bit position is same.
> >
> > >
> > > > > static void intel_dp_get_su_granularity(struct intel_dp
> > > > > *intel_dp) {
> > > > > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > > > @@ -
> > > > > 473,18
> > > > > +507,29 @@ static void intel_dp_get_su_granularity(struct
> > > > > intel_dp
> > > > > *intel_dp)
> > > > > u16 w;
> > > > > u8 y;
> > > > >
> > > > > - /* If sink don't have specific granularity
> > > > > requirements
> > > > > set legacy ones */
> > > > > - if (!(intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] &
> > > > > DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED)) {
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * TODO: Do we need to take into account panel
> > > > > supporting
> > > > > both PSR
> > > > > and
> > > > > + * Panel replay?
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * If sink don't have specific granularity
> > > > > requirements
> > > > > +set
> > > > > legacy
> > > > > + * ones.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + if (!(intel_dp_get_su_capability(intel_dp) &
> > > > > + DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED)) {
> > > > > /* As PSR2 HW sends full lines, we do not
> > > > > care
> > > > > about x granularity */
> > > > > w = 4;
> > > > > y = 4;
> > > > > goto exit;
> > > > > }
> > >
> > > This block is taking care of checking bit 5 in 0xb1 and using
> > > legacy
> > > ones if no requirements.
> >
> > intel_dp_get_su_capability is reading from
> > DP_PANEL_PANEL_REPLAY_X_GRANULARITY which Is dpcd 0xb2. Am I
> > missing something?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Animesh
> >
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Jouni Högander
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > > > DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY, &w, 2);
> > > > > + r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > > > +
> > > > > intel_dp_get_su_x_granularity_offset(intel_dp),
> > > > > + &w, 2);
> > > > > if (r != 2)
> > > > > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> > > > > - "Unable to read
> > > > > DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY\n");
> > > > > + "Unable to read selective update
> > > > > x
> > > > > granularity\n");
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Spec says that if the value read is 0 the default
> > > > > granularity should
> > > > > * be used instead.
> > > > > @@ -492,10 +537,12 @@ static void
> > > > > intel_dp_get_su_granularity(struct
> > > > > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > > if (r != 2 || w == 0)
> > > > > w = 4;
> > > > >
> > > > > - r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > > > DP_PSR2_SU_Y_GRANULARITY, &y, 1);
> > > > > + r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > > > +
> > > > > intel_dp_get_su_y_granularity_offset(intel_dp),
> > > > > + &y, 1);
> > > > > if (r != 1) {
> > > > > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> > > > > - "Unable to read
> > > > > DP_PSR2_SU_Y_GRANULARITY\n");
> > > > > + "Unable to read selective update
> > > > > y
> > > > > granularity\n");
> > > > > y = 4;
> > > > > }
> > > > > if (y == 0)
> > > > > @@ -588,7 +635,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp
> > > > > *intel_dp)
> > > > > if (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0])
> > > > > _psr_init_dpcd(intel_dp);
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (intel_dp->psr.sink_psr2_support)
> > > > > + if (intel_dp->psr.sink_psr2_support ||
> > > > > + intel_dp->psr.sink_panel_replay_su_support)
> > > > > intel_dp_get_su_granularity(intel_dp);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.34.1
> > > >
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list