[PATCHv2 2/2] drm/i915/display/dp: 128/132b DP-capable with SST

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy at intel.com> wrote:
> With a value of '0' read from MSTM_CAP register MST to be enabled.
> DP2.1 SCR updates the spec for 128/132b DP capable supporting only one
> stream and not supporting single stream sideband MSG.
> The underlying protocol will be MST to enable use of MTP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 9ff0cbd9c0df..05722f10cdd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4037,9 +4037,15 @@ intel_dp_configure_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  	if (!intel_dp_mst_source_support(intel_dp))
>  		return;
> -
> -	intel_dp->is_mst = sink_can_mst &&
> -		i915->display.params.enable_dp_mst;
> +	/*
> +	 * Even if dpcd reg MSTM_CAP is 0, if the sink supports UHBR rates then
> +	 * DP2.1 can be enabled with underlying protocol using MST for MTP
> +	 * TODO: Need to accommodate MSTM_CAP bit[0]=0, bit[1]=1 condition, i.e
> +	 * one stream with single stream sideband msg.
> +	 */
> +	intel_dp->is_mst = (sink_can_mst || (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING] &
> +					     DP_CAP_ANSI_128B132B)) &&
> +			    i915->display.params.enable_dp_mst;

Based on testing with the specific display in question, it looks like
this works because the display, while having DP_MSTM_CAP == 0, does
actually support sideband messaging. Which is unexpected.

This means a display that has DP_MSTM_CAP == 0 that actually does not
support sideband messaging, which is expected, will get a black screen
with this patch.

This was the conclusion when I discussed this with Ville and Imre.

Related to this, I've posted a series to enable MST mode for 128b/132b
displays that support single-stream with sideband messaging [1]. It
obviously does not directly help here, as that requires DP_MSTM_CAP ==
2. It might be possible to quirk the one display to use that. Maybe. The
alternative is actually implementing 128b/132b single-stream w/o
sideband messaging using our regular SST paths.

BR,
Jani.


[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/129468/


>  
>  	drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
>  					intel_dp->is_mst);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel