[RFC PATCH] drm/i915: Add GETPARAM for GuC submission version
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Feb 7 08:44:01 UTC 2024
On 06/02/2024 20:51, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:42 -0800, John Harrison wrote:
>> On 2/6/2024 08:33, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>> On 01/02/2024 18:25, Souza, Jose wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 08:55 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>>> On 24/01/2024 08:19, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>>>>>> Add reporting of the GuC submissio/VF interface version via GETPARAM
>>>>>> properties. Mesa intends to use this information to check for old
>>>>>> firmware versions with known bugs before enabling features like async
>>>>>> compute.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was
>>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/560704/?series=124592&rev=1
>>>>> which does everything in one go so would be my preference.
>>>>
>>>> IMO Joonas version brings less burden to be maintained(no new struct).
>>>> But both versions works, please just get into some agreement so we
>>>> can move this forward.
>>>
>>> So I would really prefer the query. Simplified version would do like
>>> the compile tested only:
>> Vivaik's patch is definitely preferred. It is much cleaner to make one
>> single call than having to make four separate calls. It is also
>> extensible to other firmwares if required. The only blockage against it
>> was whether it was a good thing to report at all. If that blockage is no
>> longer valid then we should just merge the patch that has already been
>> discussed, polished, fixed, etc. rather than starting the whole process
>> from scratch.
>
> Agreed.
>
> Vivaik can you please rebase and send it again?
Note there was review feedback not addressed so do that too please.
AFAIR incorrect usage of copy item, pad/rsvd/mbz checking and questions
about padding in general. Last is why I proposed a simplified version
which is not future extensible and avoids the need for padding.
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
>
>>
>> And note that it is four calls not three. The code below is missing the
>> branch version number.
>>
>> John.
>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_query.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_query.c
>>> index 00871ef99792..999687f6a3d4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_query.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_query.c
>>> @@ -551,6 +551,37 @@ static int query_hwconfig_blob(struct
>>> drm_i915_private *i915,
>>> return hwconfig->size;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int
>>> +query_guc_submission_version(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>> + struct drm_i915_query_item *query)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_i915_query_guc_submission_version __user *query_ptr =
>>> + u64_to_user_ptr(query->data_ptr);
>>> + struct drm_i915_query_guc_submission_version ver;
>>> + struct intel_guc *guc = &to_gt(i915)->uc.guc;
>>> + const size_t size = sizeof(ver);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&to_gt(i915)->uc))
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> + ret = copy_query_item(&ver, size, size, query);
>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (ver.major || ver.minor || ver.patch)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + ver.major = guc->submission_version.major;
>>> + ver.minor = guc->submission_version.minor;
>>> + ver.patch = guc->submission_version.patch;
>>> +
>>> + if (copy_to_user(query_ptr, &ver, size))
>>> + return -EFAULT;
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int (* const i915_query_funcs[])(struct drm_i915_private
>>> *dev_priv,
>>> struct drm_i915_query_item
>>> *query_item) = {
>>> query_topology_info,
>>> @@ -559,6 +590,7 @@ static int (* const i915_query_funcs[])(struct
>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>> query_memregion_info,
>>> query_hwconfig_blob,
>>> query_geometry_subslices,
>>> + query_guc_submission_version,
>>> };
>>>
>>> int i915_query_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct
>>> drm_file *file)
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>> index 550c496ce76d..d80d9b5e1eda 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>> @@ -3038,6 +3038,7 @@ struct drm_i915_query_item {
>>> * - %DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS (see struct
>>> drm_i915_query_memory_regions)
>>> * - %DRM_I915_QUERY_HWCONFIG_BLOB (see `GuC HWCONFIG blob
>>> uAPI`)
>>> * - %DRM_I915_QUERY_GEOMETRY_SUBSLICES (see struct
>>> drm_i915_query_topology_info)
>>> + * - %DRM_I915_QUERY_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION (see struct
>>> drm_i915_query_guc_submission_version)
>>> */
>>> __u64 query_id;
>>> #define DRM_I915_QUERY_TOPOLOGY_INFO 1
>>> @@ -3046,6 +3047,7 @@ struct drm_i915_query_item {
>>> #define DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS 4
>>> #define DRM_I915_QUERY_HWCONFIG_BLOB 5
>>> #define DRM_I915_QUERY_GEOMETRY_SUBSLICES 6
>>> +#define DRM_I915_QUERY_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION 7
>>> /* Must be kept compact -- no holes and well documented */
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -3591,6 +3593,15 @@ struct drm_i915_query_memory_regions {
>>> struct drm_i915_memory_region_info regions[];
>>> };
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> +* struct drm_i915_query_guc_submission_version - query GuC submission
>>> interface version
>>> +*/
>>> +struct drm_i915_query_guc_submission_version {
>>> + __u64 major;
>>> + __u64 minor;
>>> + __u64 patch;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * DOC: GuC HWCONFIG blob uAPI
>>> *
>>>
>>> It is not that much bigger that the triple get param and IMO nicer.
>>>
>>> But if there is no motivation to do it properly then feel free to
>>> proceed with this, I will not block it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tvrtko
>>>
>>> P.S.
>>> Probably still make sure to remove the reference to SR-IOV.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> During the time of that patch there was discussion whether firmware
>>>>> version or submission version was better. I vaguely remember someone
>>>>> raised an issue with the latter. Adding John in case he remembers.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Jose Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Sagar Ghuge <sagar.ghuge at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>>> include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
>>>>>> index 5c3fec63cb4c1..f176372debc54 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
>>>>>> @@ -113,6 +113,18 @@ int i915_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device
>>>>>> *dev, void *data,
>>>>>> if (value < 0)
>>>>>> return value;
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> + case I915_PARAM_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION_MAJOR:
>>>>>> + case I915_PARAM_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION_MINOR:
>>>>>> + case I915_PARAM_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION_PATCH:
>>>>>> + if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&to_gt(i915)->uc))
>>>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>>>> + if (param->param == I915_PARAM_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION_MAJOR)
>>>>>> + value = to_gt(i915)->uc.guc.submission_version.major;
>>>>>> + else if (param->param ==
>>>>>> I915_PARAM_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION_MINOR)
>>>>>> + value = to_gt(i915)->uc.guc.submission_version.minor;
>>>>>> + else
>>>>>> + value = to_gt(i915)->uc.guc.submission_version.patch;
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> case I915_PARAM_MMAP_GTT_VERSION:
>>>>>> /* Though we've started our numbering from 1, and so
>>>>>> class all
>>>>>> * earlier versions as 0, in effect their value is
>>>>>> undefined as
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>>>>> index fd4f9574d177a..7d5a47f182542 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>>>>>> @@ -806,6 +806,19 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait {
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> #define I915_PARAM_PXP_STATUS 58
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * Query for the GuC submission/VF interface version number
>>>>>
>>>>> What is this VF you speak of? :/
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Tvrtko
>>>>>
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * -ENODEV is returned if GuC submission is not used
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * On success, returns the respective GuC submission/VF interface
>>>>>> major,
>>>>>> + * minor or patch version as per the requested parameter.
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +#define I915_PARAM_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION_MAJOR 59
>>>>>> +#define I915_PARAM_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION_MINOR 60
>>>>>> +#define I915_PARAM_GUC_SUBMISSION_VERSION_PATCH 61
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> /* Must be kept compact -- no holes and well documented */
>>>>>> /**
>>>>
>>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list