[PATCH v6 3/3] drm/buddy: Add defragmentation support
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Fri Feb 16 12:23:29 UTC 2024
On 08/02/2024 15:50, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote:
> Add a function to support defragmentation.
>
> v1: Defragment the memory beginning from min_order
> till the required memory space is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam at amd.com>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> include/drm/drm_buddy.h | 3 ++
No users?
> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> index 33ad0cfbd54c..fac423d2cb73 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> @@ -276,10 +276,12 @@ drm_get_buddy(struct drm_buddy_block *block)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_get_buddy);
>
> -static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> - struct drm_buddy_block *block)
> +static unsigned int __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> + struct drm_buddy_block *block,
> + bool defrag)
> {
> struct drm_buddy_block *parent;
> + unsigned int order;
>
> while ((parent = block->parent)) {
> struct drm_buddy_block *buddy;
> @@ -289,12 +291,14 @@ static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> if (!drm_buddy_block_is_free(buddy))
> break;
>
> - if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block) !=
> - drm_buddy_block_is_clear(buddy))
> - break;
> + if (!defrag) {
> + if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block) !=
> + drm_buddy_block_is_clear(buddy))
> + break;
>
> - if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
> - mark_cleared(parent);
> + if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
> + mark_cleared(parent);
> + }
Maybe check if the two blocks are incompatible and chuck a warn if they
are not? Main thing is not to hide issues with split blocks that should
have been merged before.
>
> list_del(&buddy->link);
>
> @@ -304,8 +308,49 @@ static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> block = parent;
> }
>
> + order = drm_buddy_block_order(block);
> mark_free(mm, block);
> +
> + return order;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_buddy_defrag - Defragmentation routine
> + *
> + * @mm: DRM buddy manager
> + * @min_order: minimum order in the freelist to begin
> + * the defragmentation process
> + *
> + * Driver calls the defragmentation function when the
> + * requested memory allocation returns -ENOSPC.
> + */
> +void drm_buddy_defrag(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> + unsigned int min_order)
Just wondering if we need "full defag" also? We would probably need to
call this at fini() anyway.
> +{
> + struct drm_buddy_block *block;
> + struct list_head *list;
> + unsigned int order;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (min_order > mm->max_order)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = min_order - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
Need to be careful with min_order = 0 ?
> + list = &mm->free_list[i];
> + if (list_empty(list))
> + continue;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_reverse(block, list, link) {
Don't we need the safe_reverse() variant here, since this is removing
from the list?
> + if (!block->parent)
> + continue;
> +
> + order = __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 1);
> + if (order >= min_order)
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_buddy_defrag);
>
> /**
> * drm_buddy_free_block - free a block
> @@ -321,7 +366,7 @@ void drm_buddy_free_block(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
> mm->clear_avail += drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
>
> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_buddy_free_block);
>
> @@ -470,7 +515,7 @@ __alloc_range_bias(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> if (buddy &&
> (drm_buddy_block_is_free(block) &&
> drm_buddy_block_is_free(buddy)))
> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
>
> @@ -588,7 +633,7 @@ alloc_from_freelist(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>
> err_undo:
> if (tmp != order)
> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
>
> @@ -668,7 +713,7 @@ static int __alloc_range(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> if (buddy &&
> (drm_buddy_block_is_free(block) &&
> drm_buddy_block_is_free(buddy)))
> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
>
> err_free:
> if (err == -ENOSPC && total_allocated_on_err) {
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
> index d81c596dfa38..d0f63e7b5915 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ void drm_buddy_free_list(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> struct list_head *objects,
> unsigned int flags);
>
> +void drm_buddy_defrag(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> + unsigned int min_order);
> +
> void drm_buddy_print(struct drm_buddy *mm, struct drm_printer *p);
> void drm_buddy_block_print(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> struct drm_buddy_block *block,
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list