i915 build error on drm-misc-next
Abhinav Kumar
quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com
Fri Feb 23 17:47:11 UTC 2024
CC Dmitry
Hi Rodrigo
On 2/23/2024 9:00 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:50:06AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> With the x86_64_defconfig I see the following when building drm-misc-next:
>>
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_trace.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_dcs_backlight.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.o
>> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.o
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c: In function
>> ‘intel_write_dp_vsc_sdp’:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:4232:15: error: implicit declaration
>> of function ‘intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’; did you mean ‘drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack’?
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 4232 | len = intel_dp_vsc_sdp_pack(vsc, &sdp, sizeof(sdp));
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | drm_dp_vsc_sdp_pack
>>
>> Is this a known issue?
>
> o.O - what a mistery!
>
> it looks that drm-misc-next has only part of the patch:
> 31a5b6ed88c7 ("drm/i915/display: Unify VSC SPD preparation")
>
> without the patch itself...
>
> I couldn't even trace back to understand how the declaration is
> gone from the drm-misc-next...
>
Looks like the issue here is that the below patch which landed in
drm-misc-next
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/579128/?series=130145&rev=1
was based on top of drm-tip because the intel CI runs on drm-tip and not
drm-misc-next.
But, https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/572622/ is not present in
drm-misc-next.
Hence this broke the compilation.
How would you prefer to fix this? We revert
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130145/ from drm-misc and land
it through i915 tree and can you provide us a tag from the i915 tree to
rebase our msm-next tree on?
>>
>> -Jeff
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list