[PATCH] nightly.conf: Add the xe repo to drm-tip
Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Thu Jan 4 05:59:16 UTC 2024
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 02:50:57PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>On Tue, 2023-12-26 at 13:30 -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:36:39PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> > Add the xe repo to drm-tip and the dim tools.
>> > For now use the sha1 of the first drm-xe-next pull request for drm-
>> > tip,
>> > since that branch tip is currently adapted for our CI testing.
>> >
>> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> > Cc: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay at kernel.org>
>> > Cc: daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
>> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>> > Cc: dim-tools at lists.freedesktop.org
>> > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> > nightly.conf | 7 +++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/nightly.conf b/nightly.conf
>> > index 24126b61b797..accd3ff2cc39 100644
>> > --- a/nightly.conf
>> > +++ b/nightly.conf
>> > @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip
>> > https://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-tip
>> > https://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-tip.git
>> > "
>> > +drm_tip_repos[drm-xe]="
>> > +ssh://git@gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel.git
>> > +https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel.git
>> > +"
>> > drm_tip_repos[drm-intel]="
>> > ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-intel
>> > ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/drm-intel
>> > @@ -65,14 +69,17 @@ drm_tip_config=(
>> > "drm drm-fixes"
>> > "drm-misc drm-misc-fixes"
>> > "drm-intel drm-intel-fixes"
>> > + "drm-xe drm-xe-fixes"
>> >
>> > "drm drm-next"
>> > "drm-misc drm-misc-next-fixes"
>> > "drm-intel drm-intel-next-fixes"
>> > + "drm-xe drm-xe-next-fixes"
>> >
>> > "drm-misc drm-misc-next"
>> > "drm-intel drm-intel-next"
>> > "drm-intel drm-intel-gt-next"
>> > + "drm-xe drm-xe-next b6e1b7081768"
>>
>> yeap, up to this commit nothing else should change, but
>> then we will need an extra rebase of the rest on top of drm/drm-next.
>>
>> But then we need to decide where these following patches will live:
>> 880277f31cc69 drm/xe/guc: define LNL FW
>> 2cfc5ae1b8267 drm/xe/guc: define PVC FW
>> 52383b58eb8cf mei/hdcp: Also enable for XE
>> bea27d7369855 mei: gsc: add support for auxiliary device created by
>> Xe driver
>> fcb3410197f05 fault-inject: Include linux/types.h by default.
>> 8ebd9cd71f8ac drm/xe: Add PVC's PCI device IDs
>>
>>
>> Will it be the topic/core-for-CI?
>> or topic/xe-extras?
>> or what?
>
>This sounds to me like topic/core-for-CI? Or is there any drawback with
>that?
I think some of them are not really a "for CI". It's more like the
workflow we are adopting e.g. with guc/huc, not sending it to linux-firmware
until we are confident on what version we will start officially
supporting.
This one can't go to topic/core-for-CI neither:
fcb3410197f05 fault-inject: Include linux/types.h by default.
what it would do would be that we would not see the build error anymore,
but everyone else would (and it's not a CI-only configuration).
Unless it's merged to another branch, we shouldn't merge it.
"52383b58eb8cf mei/hdcp: Also enable for XE" could be material for
topic/core-for-CI and "8ebd9cd71f8ac drm/xe: Add PVC's PCI device IDs"
could either be on that branch or another xe-specific one.
>
>>
>> Anyway, for the inclusion like this, after our CI is ready:
>
>Could we merge this patch already at this point, considering it will,
>at least for now, only update drm-tip with our fixes?
ack
Lucas De Marchi
>
>Thanks,
>
>/Thomas
>
>
>>
>> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>>
>> >
>> > "drm-intel topic/core-for-CI"
>> > "drm-misc topic/i915-ttm"
>> > --
>> > 2.42.0
>> >
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list