[PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/display: Cleanup mplla/mpllb selection
Kahola, Mika
mika.kahola at intel.com
Thu Jan 4 09:24:41 UTC 2024
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deak, Imre <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2024 6:16 PM
> To: Kahola, Mika <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/display: Cleanup mplla/mpllb selection
>
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > The function intel_c20_use_mplla() is not really widely used and can
> > be replaced with the more suitable
> >
> > pll->tx[0] & C20_PHY_USE_MPLLB
> >
> > expression. Let's remove the intel_c20_use_mplla() alltogether and
> > replace mplla/mpllb selection by checking mpllb bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 39
> > ++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> > index fc7211675b2f..d0b6b4e439e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> > @@ -2096,15 +2096,6 @@ int intel_cx0pll_calc_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > return intel_c20pll_calc_state(crtc_state, encoder); }
> >
> > -static bool intel_c20_use_mplla(u32 clock) -{
> > - /* 10G and 20G rates use MPLLA */
> > - if (clock == 1000000 || clock == 2000000)
> > - return true;
> > -
> > - return false;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int intel_c20pll_calc_port_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > const struct intel_c20pll_state *pll_state) { @@ -2221,12
> > +2212,12 @@ void intel_c20pll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "cmn[0] = 0x%.4x, cmn[1] = 0x%.4x, cmn[2] = 0x%.4x, cmn[3] = 0x%.4x\n",
> > hw_state->cmn[0], hw_state->cmn[1], hw_state->cmn[2],
> > hw_state->cmn[3]);
> >
> > - if (intel_c20_use_mplla(hw_state->clock)) {
> > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hw_state->mplla); i++)
> > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "mplla[%d] = 0x%.4x\n", i, hw_state->mplla[i]);
> > - } else {
> > + if (hw_state->tx[0] & C20_PHY_USE_MPLLB) {
>
> The above could be in a helper.
I was thinking about to put this on helper but then decided to go with this approach. There are couple of places elsewhere where this line is used as well. I will provide a follow up patch to get these defined as helper functions.
>
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hw_state->mpllb); i++)
> > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "mpllb[%d] = 0x%.4x\n", i,
> > hw_state->mpllb[i]);
> > + } else {
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hw_state->mplla); i++)
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "mplla[%d] = 0x%.4x\n", i,
> > +hw_state->mplla[i]);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2373,27 +2364,27 @@ static void intel_c20_pll_program(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > }
> >
> > /* 3.3 mpllb or mplla configuration */
> > - if (intel_c20_use_mplla(clock)) {
> > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pll_state->mplla); i++) {
> > + if (pll_state->tx[0] & C20_PHY_USE_MPLLB) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pll_state->mpllb); i++) {
> > if (cntx)
> > intel_c20_sram_write(i915, encoder->port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0,
> > - PHY_C20_A_MPLLA_CNTX_CFG(i),
> > - pll_state->mplla[i]);
> > + PHY_C20_A_MPLLB_CNTX_CFG(i),
> > + pll_state->mpllb[i]);
>
> Imo, at one point intel_c20pll_state should be converted to use only one mpll array instead of mplla/b and define a
> PHY_C20_MPLL_CNTX_CFG(cntx, pll, idx) macro instead of the above ones.
>
Thanks for the review!
> The patchset looks ok:
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
>
> > else
> > intel_c20_sram_write(i915, encoder->port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0,
> > - PHY_C20_B_MPLLA_CNTX_CFG(i),
> > - pll_state->mplla[i]);
> > + PHY_C20_B_MPLLB_CNTX_CFG(i),
> > + pll_state->mpllb[i]);
> > }
> > } else {
> > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pll_state->mpllb); i++) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pll_state->mplla); i++) {
> > if (cntx)
> > intel_c20_sram_write(i915, encoder->port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0,
> > - PHY_C20_A_MPLLB_CNTX_CFG(i),
> > - pll_state->mpllb[i]);
> > + PHY_C20_A_MPLLA_CNTX_CFG(i),
> > + pll_state->mplla[i]);
> > else
> > intel_c20_sram_write(i915, encoder->port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0,
> > - PHY_C20_B_MPLLB_CNTX_CFG(i),
> > - pll_state->mpllb[i]);
> > + PHY_C20_B_MPLLA_CNTX_CFG(i),
> > + pll_state->mplla[i]);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list