[PATCH v2 03/13] drm/i915/psr: Do not check alpm on DP or capability change for panel replay
Hogander, Jouni
jouni.hogander at intel.com
Thu Jan 11 06:53:09 UTC 2024
On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 06:14 +0000, Manna, Animesh wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf
> > Of Jouni
> > Högander
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 6:43 PM
> > To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 03/13] drm/i915/psr: Do not check alpm on DP or
> > capability change for panel replay
> >
> > Alpm is eDP specific. Do not check if not eDP. Also panel replay
> > doesn't know
> > about capability changes -> no need to check that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index 3e287a9f0e09..a9421dd092c5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -2989,8 +2989,11 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> > /* clear status register */
> > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS,
> > error_status);
> >
> > - psr_alpm_check(intel_dp);
> > - psr_capability_changed_check(intel_dp);
> > + if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> > + psr_alpm_check(intel_dp);
> > +
> > + if (!psr->panel_replay_enabled)
> > + psr_capability_changed_check(intel_dp);
>
> There is a CAN_PSR() check starting of the function
> intel_psr_short_pulse() which will take care non-edp and panel replay
> case, so do you see any gap there?
Thank you for pointing this out. We need to run intel_psr_short_pulse
for panel replay case as well. I will add that into this patch.
BR,
Jouni Högander
>
> Regards,
> Animesh
> >
> > exit:
> > mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list