[PATCH 4/5] drm/ttm: improve idle/busy handling v3
Thomas Hellström
thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Thu Jan 18 16:48:45 UTC 2024
On 1/18/24 15:24, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 13:51 +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Previously we would never try to move a BO into the preferred
>> placements
>> when it ever landed in a busy placement since those were considered
>> compatible.
>>
>> Rework the whole handling and finally unify the idle and busy
>> handling.
>> ttm_bo_validate() is now responsible to try idle placement first and
>> then
>> use the busy placement if that didn't worked.
>>
>> Drawback is that we now always try the idle placement first for each
>> validation which might cause some additional CPU overhead on
>> overcommit.
>
>
>
>
>> v2: fix kerneldoc warning and coding style
>> v3: take care of XE as well
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 131 ++++++++-----------
>> --
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c | 16 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 4 +-
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h | 3 +-
>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h | 3 +-
>> 7 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> index b671b0665492..06fb3fc47eaa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ int amdgpu_bo_create_kernel_at(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> (*bo_ptr)->placements[i].lpfn = (offset + size) >>
>> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> }
>> r = ttm_bo_mem_space(&(*bo_ptr)->tbo, &(*bo_ptr)->placement,
>> - &(*bo_ptr)->tbo.resource, &ctx);
>> + &(*bo_ptr)->tbo.resource, &ctx, false);
>> if (r)
>> goto error;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> index 8722beba494e..f23cdc7c5b08 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_alloc_gart(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>> placements.mem_type = TTM_PL_TT;
>> placements.flags = bo->resource->placement;
>>
>> - r = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, &placement, &tmp, &ctx);
>> + r = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, &placement, &tmp, &ctx, true);
>> if (unlikely(r))
>> return r;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> index a5e11a92e0b9..3783be24d832 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_bounce_temp_buffer(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> hop_placement.placement = hop;
>>
>> /* find space in the bounce domain */
>> - ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, &hop_placement, &hop_mem, ctx);
>> + ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, &hop_placement, &hop_mem, ctx,
>> true);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> /* move to the bounce domain */
>> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_evict(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo,
>> return ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(bo);
>> }
>>
>> - ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, &placement, &evict_mem, ctx);
>> + ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, &placement, &evict_mem, ctx,
>> true);
> This is what breaks xe's selftest since the evict-flags preferred
> placement is never tried so it changes the behavior.
>
> The xe evict flags were set up to "Try to evict to TT first, but if
> that causes recursive eviction, try to evict to system". This here
> ignores the preferred eviction placement.
>
> So "Preferred" in effect changes meaning from "Don't try this if it
> will cause an eviction", to "Don't try this in the evict path", which
> is hard for the driver to have any knowledge about.
>
> Then also it sounds from the commit message with this patch "Preferred"
> also gets overloaded with "Always retry preferred on validate", but
> shouldn't that really be a dynamic driver decision and not something
> TTM should try to enforce in a static way? Drivers could have short-
> circuited the ttm_bo_validate() call if it succeeded once, and have a
> deeper thought about when to migrate from, say TT to VRAM and vice
> versa.
>
> For the specific behaviour sought here, there is (or at least used to
> be) a construct in the vmwgfx driver that first called
> ttm_bo_validate() with VRAM as preferred placement and no fallback. If
> that failed due to VRAM being full, it called ttm_bo_validate() again,
> this time with fallback and VRAM allowing eviction.
>
> /Thomas
>
To conclude here, a suggestion would be,
1) Could we separate the semantics of the "Preferred" flag. Perhaps
creating yet another one.
first flag: "Retry this placement even if bo is in a valid placement"
second flag: "Don't use this placement if it would cause an eviction"
(Retain old semantics)
Although I think the first flag behaviour can be easily implemented with
a driver specific xxx_bo_validate(), I'm not against having that in TTM
as well.
2) Please keep the old behaviour of the eviction flags? Meaning even for
eviction we have preferred and fallback placements. It comes in handy
when pipelining (always evicting to SYSTEM requires syncing), and if
opportunistically trying to evict to other VRAM memory types on
multi-tile. I see no easy way to otherwise hook into TTM to implement
that if the behaviour is changed as suggested.
Thanks,
Thomas
>
>
>> if (ret) {
>> if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS) {
>> pr_err("Failed to find memory space for
>> buffer 0x%p eviction\n",
>> @@ -724,37 +724,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_add_move_fence(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Repeatedly evict memory from the LRU for @mem_type until we
>> create enough
>> - * space, or we've evicted everything and there isn't enough space.
>> - */
>> -static int ttm_bo_mem_force_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> - const struct ttm_place *place,
>> - struct ttm_resource **mem,
>> - struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>> -{
>> - struct ttm_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
>> - struct ttm_resource_manager *man;
>> - struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket;
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, place->mem_type);
>> - ticket = dma_resv_locking_ctx(bo->base.resv);
>> - do {
>> - ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, place, mem);
>> - if (likely(!ret))
>> - break;
>> - if (unlikely(ret != -ENOSPC))
>> - return ret;
>> - ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, man, place, ctx,
>> - ticket);
>> - if (unlikely(ret != 0))
>> - return ret;
>> - } while (1);
>> -
>> - return ttm_bo_add_move_fence(bo, man, *mem, ctx-
>>> no_wait_gpu);
>> -}
>> -
>> /**
>> * ttm_bo_mem_space
>> *
>> @@ -763,6 +732,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_mem_force_space(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> * @placement: Proposed new placement for the buffer object.
>> * @mem: A struct ttm_resource.
>> * @ctx: if and how to sleep, lock buffers and alloc memory
>> + * @force_space: If we should evict buffers to force space
>> *
>> * Allocate memory space for the buffer object pointed to by @bo,
>> using
>> * the placement flags in @placement, potentially evicting other
>> idle buffer objects.
>> @@ -776,12 +746,14 @@ static int ttm_bo_mem_force_space(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> int ttm_bo_mem_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> struct ttm_placement *placement,
>> struct ttm_resource **mem,
>> - struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
>> + bool force_space)
>> {
>> struct ttm_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
>> - bool type_found = false;
>> + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket;
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> + ticket = dma_resv_locking_ctx(bo->base.resv);
>> ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(bo->base.resv, 1);
>> if (unlikely(ret))
>> return ret;
>> @@ -790,19 +762,30 @@ int ttm_bo_mem_space(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo,
>> const struct ttm_place *place = &placement-
>>> placement[i];
>> struct ttm_resource_manager *man;
>>
>> - if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_FALLBACK)
>> - continue;
>> -
>> man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, place->mem_type);
>> if (!man || !ttm_resource_manager_used(man))
>> continue;
>>
>> - type_found = true;
>> - ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, place, mem);
>> - if (ret == -ENOSPC)
>> + if (place->flags & (force_space ?
>> TTM_PL_FLAG_DESIRED :
>> + TTM_PL_FLAG_FALLBACK))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + do {
>> + ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, place, mem);
>> + if (unlikely(ret != -ENOSPC))
>> + return ret;
>> + if (likely(!ret) || !force_space)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, man, place,
>> ctx,
>> + ticket);
>> + if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY))
>> + break;
>> + if (unlikely(ret))
>> + return ret;
>> + } while (1);
>> + if (ret)
>> continue;
>> - if (unlikely(ret))
>> - goto error;
>>
>> ret = ttm_bo_add_move_fence(bo, man, *mem, ctx-
>>> no_wait_gpu);
>> if (unlikely(ret)) {
>> @@ -810,45 +793,19 @@ int ttm_bo_mem_space(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo,
>> if (ret == -EBUSY)
>> continue;
>>
>> - goto error;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < placement->num_placement; ++i) {
>> - const struct ttm_place *place = &placement-
>>> placement[i];
>> - struct ttm_resource_manager *man;
>> -
>> - if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_DESIRED)
>> - continue;
>> -
>> - man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, place->mem_type);
>> - if (!man || !ttm_resource_manager_used(man))
>> - continue;
>> -
>> - type_found = true;
>> - ret = ttm_bo_mem_force_space(bo, place, mem, ctx);
>> - if (likely(!ret))
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> - if (ret && ret != -EBUSY)
>> - goto error;
>> - }
>> -
>> - ret = -ENOSPC;
>> - if (!type_found) {
>> - pr_err(TTM_PFX "No compatible memory type found\n");
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> -error:
>> - return ret;
>> + return -ENOSPC;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_mem_space);
>>
>> static int ttm_bo_move_buffer(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> struct ttm_placement *placement,
>> - struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
>> + bool force_space)
>> {
>> struct ttm_resource *mem;
>> struct ttm_place hop;
>> @@ -865,7 +822,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_move_buffer(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> * stop and the driver will be called to make
>> * the second hop.
>> */
>> - ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, placement, &mem, ctx);
>> + ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(bo, placement, &mem, ctx,
>> force_space);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> bounce:
>> @@ -902,6 +859,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> struct ttm_placement *placement,
>> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>> {
>> + bool force_space;
>> int ret;
>>
>> dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv);
>> @@ -912,20 +870,27 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object
>> *bo,
>> if (!placement->num_placement)
>> return ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(bo);
>>
>> - /* Check whether we need to move buffer. */
>> - if (bo->resource && ttm_resource_compatible(bo->resource,
>> placement))
>> - return 0;
>> + force_space = false;
>> + do {
>> + /* Check whether we need to move buffer. */
>> + if (bo->resource &&
>> + ttm_resource_compatible(bo->resource, placement,
>> + force_space))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* Moving of pinned BOs is forbidden */
>> + if (bo->pin_count)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - /* Moving of pinned BOs is forbidden */
>> - if (bo->pin_count)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + ret = ttm_bo_move_buffer(bo, placement, ctx,
>> force_space);
>> + if (ret && ret != -ENOSPC)
>> + return ret;
>>
>> - ret = ttm_bo_move_buffer(bo, placement, ctx);
>> + force_space = !force_space;
>> + } while (force_space);
>> /* For backward compatibility with userspace */
>> if (ret == -ENOSPC)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>>
>> /*
>> * We might need to add a TTM.
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
>> index fb14f7716cf8..65155f2013ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
>> @@ -295,11 +295,13 @@ bool ttm_resource_intersects(struct ttm_device
>> *bdev,
>> *
>> * @res: the resource to check
>> * @placement: the placement to check against
>> + * @evicting: true if the caller is doing evictions
>> *
>> * Returns true if the placement is compatible.
>> */
>> bool ttm_resource_compatible(struct ttm_resource *res,
>> - struct ttm_placement *placement)
>> + struct ttm_placement *placement,
>> + bool evicting)
>> {
>> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = res->bo;
>> struct ttm_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
>> @@ -315,14 +317,20 @@ bool ttm_resource_compatible(struct
>> ttm_resource *res,
>> if (res->mem_type != place->mem_type)
>> continue;
>>
>> + if (place->flags & (evicting ? TTM_PL_FLAG_DESIRED :
>> + TTM_PL_FLAG_FALLBACK))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS &&
>> + !(res->placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, res->mem_type);
>> if (man->func->compatible &&
>> !man->func->compatible(man, res, place, bo-
>>> base.size))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if ((!(place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) ||
>> - (res->placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS)))
>> - return true;
>> + return true;
>> }
>> return false;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>> index 1e5edc7f0b85..d4b8bd774ada 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
>> @@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ int xe_bo_evict_pinned(struct xe_bo *bo)
>> if (WARN_ON(!xe_bo_is_vram(bo)))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(&bo->ttm, &placement, &new_mem,
>> &ctx);
>> + ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(&bo->ttm, &placement, &new_mem, &ctx,
>> false);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> @@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ int xe_bo_restore_pinned(struct xe_bo *bo)
>> if (WARN_ON(xe_bo_is_vram(bo) || !bo->ttm.ttm))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(&bo->ttm, &bo->placement, &new_mem,
>> &ctx);
>> + ret = ttm_bo_mem_space(&bo->ttm, &bo->placement, &new_mem,
>> &ctx, false);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
>> index 0223a41a64b2..64d738f152d1 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
>> @@ -397,7 +397,8 @@ vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_dummy_page(struct vm_fault
>> *vmf, pgprot_t prot);
>> int ttm_bo_mem_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> struct ttm_placement *placement,
>> struct ttm_resource **mem,
>> - struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx);
>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
>> + bool force_space);
>>
>> void ttm_bo_unmap_virtual(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
>> /*
>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
>> index 1afa13f0c22b..7561023db43d 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
>> @@ -366,7 +366,8 @@ bool ttm_resource_intersects(struct ttm_device
>> *bdev,
>> const struct ttm_place *place,
>> size_t size);
>> bool ttm_resource_compatible(struct ttm_resource *res,
>> - struct ttm_placement *placement);
>> + struct ttm_placement *placement,
>> + bool evicting);
>> void ttm_resource_set_bo(struct ttm_resource *res,
>> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
>>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list