[PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Add alpm_parameters struct
Hogander, Jouni
jouni.hogander at intel.com
Wed Jan 24 09:39:38 UTC 2024
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 09:28 +0000, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 2:55 PM
> > To: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy at intel.com>;
> > intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Add alpm_parameters
> > struct
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 09:17 +0000, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On
> > > > Behalf
> > > > Of Jouni Högander
> > > > Sent: Friday, January 5, 2024 7:45 PM
> > > > To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Add alpm_parameters
> > > > struct
> > > >
> > > > Add new alpm_parameters struct into intel_psr for all
> > > > calculated
> > > > alpm parameters.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 8 ++++--
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 28 ++++++++++-
> > > > ----
> > > > ----
> > > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > index b9b9d9f2bc0b..889a8b34b7ac 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > > > @@ -1677,6 +1677,11 @@ struct intel_pps {
> > > > struct edp_power_seq bios_pps_delays;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +struct alpm_parameters {
> > > > + u8 io_wake_lines;
> > > > + u8 fast_wake_lines;
> > > > +};
> > > Assume that this is being used in PSR as well and can be retained
> > > in
> > > intel_psr struct.
> > > If exclusively used for alpm then having it in a new alpm struct
> > > would
> > > be better.
> >
> > Amount of these parameters are about to grow with AUXless ALPM. I
> > was
> > thinking having own struct would be more clear. Please note that
> > alpm_params
> > is still under struct intel_psr. What do you think?
> >
> Understand that his is quite a big feature and this struct tends to
> grow in the coming patches. But w.r.t this variable since it was used
> in psr and not exclusively for alpm felt so. I would leave it for
> others in the community to add their views on this.
I don't have that strong opinions on this. I can change it back.
BR,
Jouni Högander
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Arun R Murthy
> -------------------
> > BR,
> >
> > Jouni Högander
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > Arun R Murthy
> > > -------------------
> > > > +
> > > > struct intel_psr {
> > > > /* Mutex for PSR state of the transcoder */
> > > > struct mutex lock;
> > > > @@ -1706,8 +1711,6 @@ struct intel_psr {
> > > > bool psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled;
> > > > bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
> > > > u8 sink_sync_latency;
> > > > - u8 io_wake_lines;
> > > > - u8 fast_wake_lines;
> > > > ktime_t last_entry_attempt;
> > > > ktime_t last_exit;
> > > > bool sink_not_reliable;
> > > > @@ -1721,6 +1724,7 @@ struct intel_psr {
> > > > u32 dc3co_exit_delay;
> > > > struct delayed_work dc3co_work;
> > > > u8 entry_setup_frames;
> > > > + struct alpm_parameters alpm_params;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > struct intel_dp {
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > index 54120b45958b..1709ebb31215 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > > > @@ -759,8 +759,8 @@ static u32 intel_psr2_get_tp_time(struct
> > > > intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp)
> > > >
> > > > static int psr2_block_count_lines(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > {
> > > > - return intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines < 9 &&
> > > > - intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines < 9 ? 8 : 12;
> > > > + return intel_dp->psr.alpm_params.io_wake_lines < 9 &&
> > > > + intel_dp->psr.alpm_params.fast_wake_lines < 9 ?
> > > > 8 :
> > > > 12;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static int psr2_block_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) @@ -
> > > > 797,6
> > > > +797,7 @@
> > > > static void dg2_activate_panel_replay(struct intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp)
> > > > static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) {
> > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> > > > dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > > + struct alpm_parameters *alpm_params = &intel_dp-
> > > > > psr.alpm_params;
> > > > enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp-
> > > > >psr.transcoder;
> > > > u32 val = EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
> > > > u32 psr_val = 0;
> > > > @@ -838,17 +839,17 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct
> > > > intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp)
> > > > */
> > > > int tmp;
> > > >
> > > > - tmp = map[intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines -
> > > > TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> > > > + tmp = map[alpm_params->io_wake_lines -
> > > > +TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> > > > val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(tmp +
> > > > TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES);
> > > >
> > > > - tmp = map[intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines -
> > > > TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> > > > + tmp = map[alpm_params->fast_wake_lines -
> > > > +TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> > > > val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(tmp +
> > > > TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES);
> > > > } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> > > > - val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(intel_dp-
> > > > > psr.io_wake_lines);
> > > > - val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(intel_dp-
> > > > > psr.fast_wake_lines);
> > > > + val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(alpm_params-
> > > > > io_wake_lines);
> > > > + val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(alpm_params-
> > > > > fast_wake_lines);
> > > > } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> > > > - val |= EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(intel_dp-
> > > > > psr.io_wake_lines);
> > > > - val |= EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(intel_dp-
> > > > > psr.fast_wake_lines);
> > > > + val |= EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(alpm_params-
> > > > > io_wake_lines);
> > > > + val |= EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(alpm_params-
> > > > > fast_wake_lines);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > if (intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline)
> > > > @@ -1098,10 +1099,11 @@ static bool
> > > > _compute_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline_indication(struct intel_dp
> > > > *intel_d
> > > > return true;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static bool _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct intel_dp
> > > > *intel_dp,
> > > > - struct intel_crtc_state
> > > > *crtc_state)
> > > > +static bool _compute_alpm_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > > + struct intel_crtc_state
> > > > *crtc_state)
> > > > {
> > > > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > > + struct alpm_parameters *alpm_params = &intel_dp-
> > > > > psr.alpm_params;
> > > > int io_wake_lines, io_wake_time, fast_wake_lines,
> > > > fast_wake_time;
> > > > u8 max_wake_lines;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1132,8 +1134,8 @@ static bool
> > > > _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct
> > > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > > io_wake_lines = fast_wake_lines =
> > > > max_wake_lines;
> > > >
> > > > /* According to Bspec lower limit should be set as 7
> > > > lines.
> > > > */
> > > > - intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines = max(io_wake_lines, 7);
> > > > - intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines = max(fast_wake_lines,
> > > > 7);
> > > > + alpm_params->io_wake_lines = max(io_wake_lines, 7);
> > > > + alpm_params->fast_wake_lines = max(fast_wake_lines, 7);
> > > >
> > > > return true;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -1265,7 +1267,7 @@ static bool
> > > > intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > > return false;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - if (!_compute_psr2_wake_times(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
> > > > + if (!_compute_alpm_params(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
> > > > drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > > > "PSR2 not enabled, Unable to use
> > > > long
> > > > enough wake times\n");
> > > > return false;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > >
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list