[PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/hdcp: Read Rxcaps for robustibility
Nautiyal, Ankit K
ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com
Tue Jan 30 09:08:13 UTC 2024
On 1/27/2024 12:46 PM, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> We see some monitors and docks report incorrect hdcp version
> and capability in first few reads so we read rx_caps three times
> before we conclude the monitor's or docks HDCP capability
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 22 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> index 5b724bd89329..f1b96bb3b727 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector,
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = intel_attached_dig_port(connector);
> struct drm_dp_aux *aux;
> u8 rx_caps[3];
> - int ret;
> + int ret, i;
>
> if (remote_req)
> aux = &connector->port->aux;
> @@ -648,15 +648,19 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_capable(struct intel_connector *connector,
> aux = &dig_port->dp.aux;
>
> *capable = false;
> - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(aux,
> - DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RX_CAPS_OFFSET,
> - rx_caps, HDCP_2_2_RXCAPS_LEN);
> - if (ret != HDCP_2_2_RXCAPS_LEN)
> - return ret >= 0 ? -EIO : ret;
> + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
I think it would be good to document the rationale behind retrying 3
times in comments too.
Otherwise LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
Regards,
Ankit
> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(aux,
> + DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RX_CAPS_OFFSET,
> + rx_caps, HDCP_2_2_RXCAPS_LEN);
> + if (ret != HDCP_2_2_RXCAPS_LEN)
> + return ret >= 0 ? -EIO : ret;
>
> - if (rx_caps[0] == HDCP_2_2_RX_CAPS_VERSION_VAL &&
> - HDCP_2_2_DP_HDCP_CAPABLE(rx_caps[2]))
> - *capable = true;
> + if (rx_caps[0] == HDCP_2_2_RX_CAPS_VERSION_VAL &&
> + HDCP_2_2_DP_HDCP_CAPABLE(rx_caps[2])) {
> + *capable = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list