[PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: disable fbc due to Wa_16023588340
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Tue Jul 2 08:31:13 UTC 2024
Hi,
On 02/07/2024 09:17, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2024, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com> wrote:
>> On BMG-G21 we need to disable fbc due to complications around the WA.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Try to handle with i915_drv.h and compat layer. (Rodrigo)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>> Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> Cc: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai at intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 5 +++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> index 67116c9f1464..60131de77b4c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> @@ -1237,6 +1237,11 @@ static int intel_fbc_check_plane(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> + if (DISPLAY_NEEDS_WA_16023588340(i915)) {
>> + plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "Wa_16023588340";
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* WaFbcTurnOffFbcWhenHyperVisorIsUsed:skl,bxt */
>> if (i915_vtd_active(i915) && (IS_SKYLAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915))) {
>> plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "VT-d enabled";
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index d7723dd11c80..816a01fda3fe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -762,4 +762,6 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> #define HAS_LMEMBAR_SMEM_STOLEN(i915) (!HAS_LMEM(i915) && \
>> GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70))
>>
>> +#define DISPLAY_NEEDS_WA_16023588340(i915) false
>> +
>
> Display feature macros don't belong in i915_drv.h.
There is also the v1 here:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/599900/?series=135061&rev=1
Where feedback was to handle it in i915_drv.h. Is the v1 method
acceptable here? Do you have an alternative suggestion?
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
>> index 2feedddf1e40..a4256144dff7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
>> #include "i915_utils.h"
>> #include "intel_runtime_pm.h"
>> #include "xe_device_types.h"
>> +#include "xe_wa.h"
>> +
>> +#include <generated/xe_wa_oob.h>
>>
>> static inline struct drm_i915_private *to_i915(const struct drm_device *dev)
>> {
>> @@ -120,6 +123,8 @@ struct i915_sched_attr {
>>
>> #define FORCEWAKE_ALL XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL
>>
>> +#define DISPLAY_NEEDS_WA_16023588340(xe) XE_WA(xe_root_mmio_gt(xe), 16023588340)
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>> /*
>> * arm64 indirectly includes linux/rtc.h,
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list