[PATCH 06/20] drm/i915/fbc: s/intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen()/intel_fbc_surface_size_ok()/

[Ville Syrjala]

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Rename intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen() to intel_fbc_surface_size_ok()
so that the naming scheme is the same for the surface size vs. plane
size checks. "surface size" is what bspec talks about.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
index c7fd774440a8..40a3b4937dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
@@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@ static void intel_fbc_max_surface_size(struct intel_display *display,
  * the X and Y offset registers. That's why we include the src x/y offsets
  * instead of just looking at the plane size.
  */
-static bool intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
+static bool intel_fbc_surface_size_ok(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
 {
 	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(plane_state->uapi.plane->dev);
 	unsigned int effective_w, effective_h, max_w, max_h;
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ static int intel_fbc_check_plane(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (!intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(plane_state)) {
+	if (!intel_fbc_surface_size_ok(plane_state)) {
 		plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "surface size too big";
 		return 0;
 	}
-- 
2.44.2