[PATCH v4 3/6] drm/i915: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Easwar,

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/,
> fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that
> the approved verbiage exists in the specification.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Acked-by: Zhi Wang <zhiwang at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha at linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7017.c     | 14 ++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7xxx.c     | 18 +++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ivch.c       | 16 +++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ns2501.c     | 18 +++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_sil164.c     | 18 +++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_tfp410.c     | 18 +++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c     | 22 +++++++-------
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.h      |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c  | 20 ++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c      | 14 ++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h  |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c    |  4 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c     | 30 +++++++++----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h |  4 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.c               | 28 ++++++++---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.h               |  4 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c           |  2 +-
>  18 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)

it's a complex/long patch and I want to make sure there are no
subtle errors. I will submit another round of tests and if it
convinces me, I will take it in.

The failures you see[*] are definitely not related to this patch,
but better safe safe safe than sorry sorry sorry :-)

Thanks,
Andi

[*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/131867/