[PATCH i-g-t] tests/xe_gt_freq: Avoid RPe usage in subtests
Vinay Belgaumkar
vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com
Wed Jul 24 16:59:52 UTC 2024
We are seeing several instances where the RPe, which can be altered by
pcode dynamically, is causing subtests to fail randomly. Instead of relying
on it, we can use a mid frequency value for these subtests and avoid these
failures.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2262
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2256
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com>
---
tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c b/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
index 93ebb5ed0..442f5658f 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
#include <sys/time.h>
#define MAX_N_EXEC_QUEUES 16
+#define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
+#define GT_FREQUENCY_SCALER 3
+#define FREQ_UNIT_MHZ (GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER / GT_FREQUENCY_SCALER)
/*
* Too many intermediate components and steps before freq is adjusted
@@ -70,6 +73,16 @@ static uint32_t get_freq(int fd, int gt_id, const char *freq_name)
return freq;
}
+static bool within_expected_range(uint32_t freq, uint32_t val)
+{
+ /*
+ * GT Frequencies are requested at units of 16.66 Mhz, so allow
+ * that tolerance.
+ */
+ return (freq <= val + FREQ_UNIT_MHZ) ||
+ (freq >= val - FREQ_UNIT_MHZ);
+}
+
static uint32_t rpe(int fd, int gt_id)
{
return get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpe");
@@ -128,6 +141,8 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int fd, int gt_id)
{
uint32_t rpn = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpn");
uint32_t rp0 = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rp0");
+ uint32_t rpmid = (rp0 + rpn) / 2;
+ uint32_t min_freq, max_freq;
/*
* Negative bound tests
@@ -142,16 +157,18 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int fd, int gt_id)
/* Assert min requests are respected from rp0 to rpn */
igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rp0) > 0);
igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "min") == rp0);
- igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
- igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "min") == rpe(fd, gt_id));
+ igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpmid) > 0);
+ min_freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "min");
+ igt_assert(within_expected_range(min_freq, rpmid));
igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpn) > 0);
igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "min") == rpn);
/* Assert max requests are respected from rpn to rp0 */
igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpn) > 0);
igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "max") == rpn);
- igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
- igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "max") == rpe(fd, gt_id));
+ igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpmid) > 0);
+ max_freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "min");
+ igt_assert(within_expected_range(max_freq, rpmid));
igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rp0) > 0);
igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "max") == rp0);
}
@@ -168,6 +185,8 @@ static void test_freq_fixed(int fd, int gt_id, bool gt_idle)
{
uint32_t rpn = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rpn");
uint32_t rp0 = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "rp0");
+ uint32_t rpmid = (rp0 + rpn) / 2;
+ uint32_t cur_freq, act_freq;
igt_debug("Starting testing fixed request\n");
@@ -190,17 +209,19 @@ static void test_freq_fixed(int fd, int gt_id, bool gt_idle)
igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act") == rpn);
}
- igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
- igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpe(fd, gt_id)) > 0);
+ igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rpmid) > 0);
+ igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "max", rpmid) > 0);
usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US);
- igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "cur") == rpe(fd, gt_id));
+ cur_freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "cur");
+ igt_assert(within_expected_range(cur_freq, rpmid));
if (gt_idle) {
igt_assert_f(igt_wait(xe_is_gt_in_c6(fd, gt_id), 1000, 10),
"GT %d should be in C6\n", gt_id);
igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act") == 0);
} else {
- igt_assert(get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act") == rpe(fd, gt_id));
+ act_freq = get_freq(fd, gt_id, "act");
+ igt_assert(within_expected_range(act_freq, rpmid));
}
igt_assert(set_freq(fd, gt_id, "min", rp0) > 0);
--
2.38.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list