[PATCH 36/65] drm/i915: pass dev_priv explicitly to _PIPEBDSL
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Jun 6 16:04:55 UTC 2024
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:25:54PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Avoid the implicit dev_priv local variable use, and pass dev_priv
> explicitly to the _PIPEBDSL register macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 2f942882e7ed..0a2111b0cd98 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -2296,7 +2296,7 @@
> #define SWF_ILK(i) _MMIO(0x4F000 + (i) * 4)
>
> /* Pipe B */
> -#define _PIPEBDSL (DISPLAY_MMIO_BASE(dev_priv) + 0x71000)
> +#define _PIPEBDSL(dev_priv) (DISPLAY_MMIO_BASE(dev_priv) + 0x71000)
should we simply remove this reg for now, or one of those cases that
are getting added as we speak?
anyone to Cc here then?
but up to you:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> #define _TRANSBCONF (DISPLAY_MMIO_BASE(dev_priv) + 0x71008)
> #define _PIPEBSTAT (DISPLAY_MMIO_BASE(dev_priv) + 0x71024)
> #define _PIPEBFRAMEHIGH 0x71040
> --
> 2.39.2
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list