[PATCH 40/65] drm/i915: pass dev_priv explicitly to _PIPEB_FLIPCOUNT_G4X
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Jun 6 16:07:15 UTC 2024
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:25:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Avoid the implicit dev_priv local variable use, and pass dev_priv
> explicitly to the _PIPEB_FLIPCOUNT_G4X register macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index f5367ec58400..fb1dc6f5e903 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@
> #define _PIPEBFRAMEHIGH 0x71040
> #define _PIPEBFRAMEPIXEL 0x71044
> #define _PIPEB_FRMCOUNT_G4X(dev_priv) (DISPLAY_MMIO_BASE(dev_priv) + 0x71040)
> -#define _PIPEB_FLIPCOUNT_G4X (DISPLAY_MMIO_BASE(dev_priv) + 0x71044)
> +#define _PIPEB_FLIPCOUNT_G4X(dev_priv) (DISPLAY_MMIO_BASE(dev_priv) + 0x71044)
G4X? and many cases... starting to have a feeling that those
are really not going to be used so soon and should be removed.
but, again, up to you:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>
>
> /* Display B control */
> --
> 2.39.2
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list