Regression on linux-next (next-20240228)
Matthew Wilcox
willy at infradead.org
Mon Mar 4 05:57:07 UTC 2024
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:49:47AM +0000, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
> After bisecting the tree, the following patch [4] seems to be the first "bad"
> commit
>
> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> commit ac7130117e8860081be88149061b5abb654d5759
> Author: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) mailto:willy at infradead.org
> Date: Tue Feb 27 17:42:41 2024 +0000
>
> mm: use free_unref_folios() in put_pages_list()
>
> Break up the list of folios into batches here so that the folios are more
> likely to be cache hot when doing the rest of the processing.
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-8-willy@infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) mailto:willy at infradead.org
> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
>
> We could not revert the patch because of a build errors but resetting to the parent of the commit seems to fix the issue
>
> Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide a fix if necessary?
Could you try putting the two:
- list_del(&folio->lru);
statements back in and see if that fixes it?
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list