[PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Rename the crtc/crtc_states in the top level DDI hooks/etc

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
>> I also wonder whether should we really emphasize things like "master"/"slave"
>> in function names. I thought that one idea in our refactoring was to unify
>> joined pipes handling so that there are no(or at least almost no) explicit code
>> paths/function names for masters/slaves.
>
> There are no master vs. slave functions. The split is going to be
> transcoder/port vs. pipe.

Besides, for modern platforms the spec has already been changed to use
primary/secondary terminology. When renaming or refactoring stuff,
please switch to them instead of sticking with master/slave.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel