[PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Break intel_dbuf_mbus_update into 2 separate parts

Stanislav Lisovskiy stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com
Fri Mar 22 11:40:43 UTC 2024


We need to be able to update dbuf min tracker and mdclk ratio
separately if mbus_join state didn't change, so lets add one
degree of freedom and make it possible.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 55 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
index 8ff69da664807..2b947870527fc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
@@ -3570,16 +3570,38 @@ void intel_dbuf_mdclk_cdclk_ratio_update(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 ratio
 			     DBUF_MIN_TRACKER_STATE_SERVICE(ratio - 1));
 }
 
+static void intel_dbuf_mdclk_min_tracker_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+	const struct intel_dbuf_state *old_dbuf_state =
+		intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
+	const struct intel_dbuf_state *new_dbuf_state =
+		intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
+
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20 &&
+	    old_dbuf_state->mdclk_cdclk_ratio != new_dbuf_state->mdclk_cdclk_ratio) {
+		/*
+		 * For Xe2LPD and beyond, when there is a change in the ratio
+		 * between MDCLK and CDCLK, updates to related registers need to
+		 * happen at a specific point in the CDCLK change sequence. In
+		 * that case, we defer to the call to
+		 * intel_dbuf_mdclk_cdclk_ratio_update() to the CDCLK logic.
+		 */
+		return;
+	}
+
+	intel_dbuf_mdclk_cdclk_ratio_update(i915, new_dbuf_state->mdclk_cdclk_ratio,
+					    new_dbuf_state->joined_mbus);
+}
+
 /*
  * Configure MBUS_CTL and all DBUF_CTL_S of each slice to join_mbus state before
  * update the request state of all DBUS slices.
  */
-static void intel_dbuf_mbus_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+static void intel_dbuf_mbus_join_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
 	u32 mbus_ctl;
-	const struct intel_dbuf_state *old_dbuf_state =
-		intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
 	const struct intel_dbuf_state *new_dbuf_state =
 		intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
 
@@ -3600,21 +3622,6 @@ static void intel_dbuf_mbus_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	intel_de_rmw(i915, MBUS_CTL,
 		     MBUS_HASHING_MODE_MASK | MBUS_JOIN |
 		     MBUS_JOIN_PIPE_SELECT_MASK, mbus_ctl);
-
-	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20 &&
-	    old_dbuf_state->mdclk_cdclk_ratio != new_dbuf_state->mdclk_cdclk_ratio) {
-		/*
-		 * For Xe2LPD and beyond, when there is a change in the ratio
-		 * between MDCLK and CDCLK, updates to related registers need to
-		 * happen at a specific point in the CDCLK change sequence. In
-		 * that case, we defer to the call to
-		 * intel_dbuf_mdclk_cdclk_ratio_update() to the CDCLK logic.
-		 */
-		return;
-	}
-
-	intel_dbuf_mdclk_cdclk_ratio_update(i915, new_dbuf_state->mdclk_cdclk_ratio,
-					    new_dbuf_state->joined_mbus);
 }
 
 void intel_dbuf_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
@@ -3632,8 +3639,10 @@ void intel_dbuf_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 
 	WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);
 
-	if (!old_dbuf_state->joined_mbus && new_dbuf_state->joined_mbus)
-		intel_dbuf_mbus_update(state);
+	if (!old_dbuf_state->joined_mbus && new_dbuf_state->joined_mbus) {
+		intel_dbuf_mbus_join_update(state);
+		intel_dbuf_mdclk_min_tracker_update(state);
+	}
 
 	gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915,
 				old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices |
@@ -3655,8 +3664,10 @@ void intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 
 	WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);
 
-	if (old_dbuf_state->joined_mbus && !new_dbuf_state->joined_mbus)
-		intel_dbuf_mbus_update(state);
+	if (old_dbuf_state->joined_mbus && !new_dbuf_state->joined_mbus) {
+		intel_dbuf_mbus_join_update(state);
+		intel_dbuf_mdclk_min_tracker_update(state);
+	}
 
 	gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915,
 				new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices);
-- 
2.37.3



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list