[PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Optimize out redundant dbuf slice updates
Shankar, Uma
uma.shankar at intel.com
Thu Mar 28 16:12:23 UTC 2024
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjala
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 11:16 PM
> To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Optimize out redundant dbuf slice updates
>
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> if the new dbuf slices are a superset of the old dbuf slices then we don't have to
> do anything in intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(). Restructure the code to skip such
> redundant dbuf slice updates. The main benefit is slightly less confusing logs.
Looks Good to me.
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 27 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index 1b48009efe2b..50ec51065118 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -3788,16 +3788,20 @@ void intel_dbuf_pre_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
> intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
> const struct intel_dbuf_state *old_dbuf_state =
> intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
> + u8 old_slices, new_slices;
>
> - if (!new_dbuf_state ||
> - new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
> + if (!new_dbuf_state)
> + return;
> +
> + old_slices = old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
> + new_slices = old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices |
> +new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
> +
> + if (old_slices == new_slices)
> return;
>
> WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);
>
> - gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915,
> - old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices |
> - new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices);
> + gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915, new_slices);
> }
>
> void intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state) @@ -
> 3807,15 +3811,20 @@ void intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
> intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
> const struct intel_dbuf_state *old_dbuf_state =
> intel_atomic_get_old_dbuf_state(state);
> + u8 old_slices, new_slices;
>
> - if (!new_dbuf_state ||
> - new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices == old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices)
> + if (!new_dbuf_state)
> + return;
> +
> + old_slices = old_dbuf_state->enabled_slices | new_dbuf_state-
> >enabled_slices;
> + new_slices = new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices;
> +
> + if (old_slices == new_slices)
> return;
>
> WARN_ON(!new_dbuf_state->base.changed);
>
> - gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915,
> - new_dbuf_state->enabled_slices);
> + gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915, new_slices);
> }
>
> static int skl_watermark_ipc_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> --
> 2.43.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list