[PATCH v1 10/12] sfc: falcon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive
Easwar Hariharan
eahariha at linux.microsoft.com
Mon May 6 15:54:47 UTC 2024
On 5/3/2024 3:13 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:38:09 +0000 Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
>> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
>> in the specification.
>>
>> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
>
> FWIW we're assuming someone (Wolfram?) will take all of these,
> instead of area maintainers picking them individually.
> Please let us know if that's incorrect.
I think, based on the trend in the v2 conversation[1], that's correct. If maintainers of
other areas disagree, please chime in.
Thanks,
Easwar
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240503181333.2336999-1-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com/
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list