[PATCH v2 01/12] drm/amdgpu, drm/radeon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

[Alex Deucher]

On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:32 PM Easwar Hariharan
<eahariha at linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/3/2024 11:13 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
> > series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
> > I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
> > in the specification.
> >
> > Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha at linux.microsoft.com>
> > ---
> >  .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atomfirmware.c  |  8 +++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_i2c.c       | 10 +++----
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/atombios_i2c.c     |  8 +++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/atombios_i2c.h     |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.c    | 20 ++++++-------
> >  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/bios/bios_parser.c |  2 +-
> >  .../drm/amd/display/dc/bios/bios_parser2.c    |  2 +-
> >  .../drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link_exports.c |  4 +--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc.h           |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_i2c.c  |  4 +--
> >  .../display/include/grph_object_ctrl_defs.h   |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/atombios.h        |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/atomfirmware.h    | 26 ++++++++---------
> >  .../powerplay/hwmgr/vega20_processpptables.c  |  4 +--
> >  .../amd/pm/powerplay/inc/smu11_driver_if.h    |  2 +-
> >  .../inc/pmfw_if/smu11_driver_if_arcturus.h    |  2 +-
> >  .../inc/pmfw_if/smu11_driver_if_navi10.h      |  2 +-
> >  .../pmfw_if/smu11_driver_if_sienna_cichlid.h  |  2 +-
> >  .../inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_aldebaran.h   |  2 +-
> >  .../inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_0.h     |  2 +-
> >  .../inc/pmfw_if/smu13_driver_if_v13_0_7.h     |  2 +-
> >  .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/arcturus_ppt.c |  4 +--
> >  .../amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/sienna_cichlid_ppt.c   |  8 +++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios.h             | 16 +++++------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_i2c.c         |  4 +--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c       | 28 +++++++++----------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c           | 10 +++----
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_mode.h          |  6 ++--
> >  28 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> Hello Christian, Daniel, David, others,
>
> Could you re-review v2 since the feedback provided in v0 [1] has now been addressed? I can send v3 with
> all other feedback and signoffs from the other maintainers incorporated when I have something for amdgpu
> and radeon.

This seems like a lot of churn.  Additionally, a bunch of these
headers are shared with other OSes, so it's possible some of the
changes may end up getting reverted accidently when we sync up or we
may add new headers in new code with the old nomenclature and then
we'd need to make sure to adjust it to make sure everything was
aligned again.  I would just as soon leave things as is, but I'm open
to acking them if there is a strong desire to update things.

Alex