[PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: pass dev_priv explicitly to TRANS_VRR_VMAXSHIFT

[Jani Nikula]

On Thu, 09 May 2024, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 06:47:50PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Avoid the implicit dev_priv local variable use, and pass dev_priv
>> explicitly to the TRANS_VRR_VMAXSHIFT register macro.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 775c878ca72f..9739ef525e13 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@
>>  #define _TRANS_VRR_VMAXSHIFT_B		0x61428
>>  #define _TRANS_VRR_VMAXSHIFT_C		0x62428
>>  #define _TRANS_VRR_VMAXSHIFT_D		0x63428
>> -#define TRANS_VRR_VMAXSHIFT(trans)	_MMIO_TRANS2(dev_priv, trans, \
>> +#define TRANS_VRR_VMAXSHIFT(dev_priv, trans)	_MMIO_TRANS2(dev_priv, trans, \
>
> unused? should we remove?
> or one of those with wip around that is going to get used soon?
> if so,

VRR is new-ish, so I decided to keep these even though I don't know for
sure that they will be used soon.

> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>

Thanks for the review, series pushed to din.

BR,
Jani.

>
>>  					_TRANS_VRR_VMAXSHIFT_A)
>>  #define   VRR_VMAXSHIFT_DEC_MASK	REG_GENMASK(29, 16)
>>  #define   VRR_VMAXSHIFT_DEC		REG_BIT(16)
>> -- 
>> 2.39.2
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel