[PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/wm: clarify logging on not finding CxSR latency config
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Thu May 30 06:59:37 UTC 2024
On Wed, 29 May 2024, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 05:24:51PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Clarify and unify the logging on not finding PNV CxSR latency config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c | 17 +++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c
>> index 8657ec0abd2d..8b8a0f305c3a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_wm.c
>> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static const struct cxsr_latency *pnv_get_cxsr_latency(struct drm_i915_private *
>> int i;
>>
>> if (i915->fsb_freq == 0 || i915->mem_freq == 0)
>> - return NULL;
>> + goto err;
>
> Is there even a need for this check? 0/0 will fail to match anything in
> the table and will just drop through to the debug message anyway, right?
True, could be dropped. I just thought it was more explicit this way,
but maybe fewer lines is better.
BR,
Jani.
>
>
> Matt
>
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cxsr_latency_table); i++) {
>> const struct cxsr_latency *latency = &cxsr_latency_table[i];
>> @@ -88,7 +88,10 @@ static const struct cxsr_latency *pnv_get_cxsr_latency(struct drm_i915_private *
>> return latency;
>> }
>>
>> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Unknown FSB/MEM found, disable CxSR\n");
>> +err:
>> + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
>> + "Could not find CxSR latency for DDR%s, FSB %u MHz, MEM %u MHz\n",
>> + i915->is_ddr3 ? "3" : "2", i915->fsb_freq, i915->mem_freq);
>>
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> @@ -637,8 +640,7 @@ static void pnv_update_wm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>
>> latency = pnv_get_cxsr_latency(dev_priv);
>> if (!latency) {
>> - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
>> - "Unknown FSB/MEM found, disable CxSR\n");
>> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Unknown FSB/MEM, disabling CxSR\n");
>> intel_set_memory_cxsr(dev_priv, false);
>> return;
>> }
>> @@ -4023,12 +4025,7 @@ void i9xx_wm_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> dev_priv->display.funcs.wm = &g4x_wm_funcs;
>> } else if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>> if (!pnv_get_cxsr_latency(dev_priv)) {
>> - drm_info(&dev_priv->drm,
>> - "failed to find known CxSR latency "
>> - "(found ddr%s fsb freq %d, mem freq %d), "
>> - "disabling CxSR\n",
>> - (dev_priv->is_ddr3 == 1) ? "3" : "2",
>> - dev_priv->fsb_freq, dev_priv->mem_freq);
>> + drm_info(&dev_priv->drm, "Unknown FSB/MEM, disabling CxSR\n");
>> /* Disable CxSR and never update its watermark again */
>> intel_set_memory_cxsr(dev_priv, false);
>> dev_priv->display.funcs.wm = &nop_funcs;
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list