[PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Sanitize MBUS joining
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Fri Nov 1 10:39:04 UTC 2024
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> If the system boots with MBUS joining enabled but we disable
> the relevant pipe during sanitaion we later get into trouble
*sanitation
> as the rest of the code doesn't expect MBUS joining to be
> enabled unless the set of active pipes is in agreement.
>
> We could relax some of the MBUS joining related checks during
> normal atomic commits to let this slide, but that might also
> let some real bugs through. So let's sanitize the MBUS joining
> instead. And in order to keep things more or less in sync we'll
> do the related credit, cdclk/mdclk ratio, etc. updates as well.
Okay, I'm a bit lacking on confidence with this part of the driver, but
it looks sensible. Fingers crossed.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
And the same nitpick about i915 usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index 2eefeff6693a..98f9e01b2a1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -3567,6 +3567,29 @@ void intel_dbuf_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> gen9_dbuf_slices_update(i915, new_slices);
> }
>
> +static void skl_mbus_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + struct intel_dbuf_state *dbuf_state =
> + to_intel_dbuf_state(i915->display.dbuf.obj.state);
> +
> + if (!HAS_MBUS_JOINING(i915))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!dbuf_state->joined_mbus ||
> + adlp_check_mbus_joined(dbuf_state->active_pipes))
> + return;
> +
> + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Disabling redundant MBUS joining (active pipes 0x%x)\n",
> + dbuf_state->active_pipes);
> +
> + dbuf_state->joined_mbus = false;
> + intel_dbuf_mdclk_cdclk_ratio_update(i915,
> + dbuf_state->mdclk_cdclk_ratio,
> + dbuf_state->joined_mbus);
> + pipe_mbus_dbox_ctl_update(i915, dbuf_state);
> + mbus_ctl_join_update(i915, dbuf_state, INVALID_PIPE);
> +}
> +
> static bool skl_dbuf_is_misconfigured(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> const struct intel_dbuf_state *dbuf_state =
> @@ -3599,7 +3622,7 @@ static bool skl_dbuf_is_misconfigured(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static void skl_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +static void skl_dbuf_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>
> @@ -3638,7 +3661,9 @@ static void skl_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> static void skl_wm_get_hw_state_and_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> skl_wm_get_hw_state(i915);
> - skl_wm_sanitize(i915);
> +
> + skl_mbus_sanitize(i915);
> + skl_dbuf_sanitize(i915);
> }
>
> void intel_wm_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list