[PATCH 09/15] drm/i915/display: convert HAS_SAGV() to struct intel_display
Govindapillai, Vinod
vinod.govindapillai at intel.com
Wed Nov 6 10:38:03 UTC 2024
On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 19:19 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Convert HAS_SAGV() to struct intel_display. Do minimal drive-by
> conversions to struct intel_display in the callers while at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 50 +++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai at intel.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> index a0fed40b7779..c23823769911 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> @@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ struct intel_display_platforms {
> #define HAS_PSR(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_psr)
> #define HAS_PSR_HW_TRACKING(i915) (DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_psr_hw_tracking)
> #define HAS_PSR2_SEL_FETCH(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
> -#define HAS_SAGV(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9 && !IS_BROXTON(i915) &&
> !IS_GEMINILAKE(i915))
> +#define HAS_SAGV(__display) (DISPLAY_VER(__display) >= 9 && \
> + !(__display)->platform.broxton && !(__display)-
> >platform.geminilake)
> #define HAS_TRANSCODER(i915, trans) ((DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cpu_transcoder_mask & \
> BIT(trans)) != 0)
> #define HAS_UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER(i915) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 13)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index 83e2cbbfcaf0..09af693da586 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -77,20 +77,23 @@ static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> bool
> intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - return HAS_SAGV(i915) &&
> - i915->display.sagv.status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
> + struct intel_display *display = &i915->display;
> +
> + return HAS_SAGV(display) && display->sagv.status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
> }
>
> static u32
> intel_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14) {
> + struct intel_display *display = &i915->display;
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 14) {
> u32 val;
>
> - val = intel_de_read(i915, MTL_LATENCY_SAGV);
> + val = intel_de_read(display, MTL_LATENCY_SAGV);
>
> return REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_LATENCY_QCLK_SAGV, val);
> - } else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12) {
> + } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12) {
> u32 val = 0;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -98,14 +101,14 @@ intel_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> GEN12_PCODE_READ_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME_US,
> &val, NULL);
> if (ret) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Couldn't read SAGV block time!\n");
> + drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Couldn't read SAGV block time!\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> return val;
> - } else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 11) {
> + } else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 11) {
> return 10;
> - } else if (HAS_SAGV(i915)) {
> + } else if (HAS_SAGV(display)) {
> return 30;
> } else {
> return 0;
> @@ -114,31 +117,33 @@ intel_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>
> static void intel_sagv_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - if (!HAS_SAGV(i915))
> - i915->display.sagv.status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
> + struct intel_display *display = &i915->display;
> +
> + if (!HAS_SAGV(display))
> + display->sagv.status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
>
> /*
> * Probe to see if we have working SAGV control.
> * For icl+ this was already determined by intel_bw_init_hw().
> */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 11)
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 11)
> skl_sagv_disable(i915);
>
> - drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, i915->display.sagv.status == I915_SAGV_UNKNOWN);
> + drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, display->sagv.status == I915_SAGV_UNKNOWN);
>
> - i915->display.sagv.block_time_us = intel_sagv_block_time(i915);
> + display->sagv.block_time_us = intel_sagv_block_time(i915);
>
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "SAGV supported: %s, original SAGV block time: %u us\n",
> - str_yes_no(intel_has_sagv(i915)), i915->display.sagv.block_time_us);
> + drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "SAGV supported: %s, original SAGV block time: %u us\n",
> + str_yes_no(intel_has_sagv(i915)), display->sagv.block_time_us);
>
> /* avoid overflow when adding with wm0 latency/etc. */
> - if (drm_WARN(&i915->drm, i915->display.sagv.block_time_us > U16_MAX,
> + if (drm_WARN(display->drm, display->sagv.block_time_us > U16_MAX,
> "Excessive SAGV block time %u, ignoring\n",
> - i915->display.sagv.block_time_us))
> - i915->display.sagv.block_time_us = 0;
> + display->sagv.block_time_us))
> + display->sagv.block_time_us = 0;
>
> if (!intel_has_sagv(i915))
> - i915->display.sagv.block_time_us = 0;
> + display->sagv.block_time_us = 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -3832,13 +3837,14 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(intel_sagv_status);
>
> void skl_watermark_debugfs_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - struct drm_minor *minor = i915->drm.primary;
> + struct intel_display *display = &i915->display;
> + struct drm_minor *minor = display->drm->primary;
>
> - if (HAS_IPC(i915))
> + if (HAS_IPC(display))
> debugfs_create_file("i915_ipc_status", 0644, minor->debugfs_root, i915,
> &skl_watermark_ipc_status_fops);
>
> - if (HAS_SAGV(i915))
> + if (HAS_SAGV(display))
> debugfs_create_file("i915_sagv_status", 0444, minor->debugfs_root, i915,
> &intel_sagv_status_fops);
> }
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list