[PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/pps: Store the power cycle delay without the +1
Ville Syrjala
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 6 21:58:52 UTC 2024
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
The code initializing the power sequencing delays is a bit
hard to follow. One confusing thing is that we keep doing the
+/-1 adjustment for the hardware register value in several places.
Simplify this a bit by doing the adjustment only when reading or
writing the actual register.
This also matches how the LVDS code does things.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 28 ++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
index 093fe37a3983..83d65105f32b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
@@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@ static void
intel_pps_readout_hw_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct edp_power_seq *seq)
{
struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
- u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_ctl;
+ u32 pp_on, pp_off, pp_ctl, power_cycle_delay;
struct pps_registers regs;
intel_pps_get_registers(intel_dp, ®s);
@@ -1415,10 +1415,13 @@ intel_pps_readout_hw_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct edp_power_seq *seq)
pp_div = intel_de_read(display, regs.pp_div);
- seq->t11_t12 = REG_FIELD_GET(PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK, pp_div) * 1000;
+ power_cycle_delay = REG_FIELD_GET(PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK, pp_div);
} else {
- seq->t11_t12 = REG_FIELD_GET(BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK, pp_ctl) * 1000;
+ power_cycle_delay = REG_FIELD_GET(BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK, pp_ctl);
}
+
+ /* hardware wants <delay>+1 in 100ms units */
+ seq->t11_t12 = power_cycle_delay ? (power_cycle_delay - 1) * 1000 : 0;
}
static void
@@ -1494,12 +1497,6 @@ static void pps_init_delays_vbt(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
vbt->t11_t12);
}
- /* T11_T12 delay is special and actually in units of 100ms, but zero
- * based in the hw (so we need to add 100 ms). But the sw vbt
- * table multiplies it with 1000 to make it in units of 100usec,
- * too. */
- vbt->t11_t12 += 100 * 10;
-
intel_pps_dump_state(intel_dp, "vbt", vbt);
}
@@ -1516,11 +1513,7 @@ static void pps_init_delays_spec(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
spec->t8 = 50 * 10; /* no limit for t8, use t7 instead */
spec->t9 = 50 * 10; /* no limit for t9, make it symmetric with t8 */
spec->t10 = 500 * 10;
- /* This one is special and actually in units of 100ms, but zero
- * based in the hw (so we need to add 100 ms). But the sw vbt
- * table multiplies it with 1000 to make it in units of 100usec,
- * too. */
- spec->t11_t12 = (510 + 100) * 10;
+ spec->t11_t12 = 510 * 10;
intel_pps_dump_state(intel_dp, "spec", spec);
}
@@ -1665,11 +1658,14 @@ static void pps_init_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool force_disable_vdd
*/
if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(regs.pp_div))
intel_de_write(display, regs.pp_div,
- REG_FIELD_PREP(PP_REFERENCE_DIVIDER_MASK, (100 * div) / 2 - 1) | REG_FIELD_PREP(PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK, DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000)));
+ REG_FIELD_PREP(PP_REFERENCE_DIVIDER_MASK,
+ (100 * div) / 2 - 1) |
+ REG_FIELD_PREP(PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK,
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000) + 1));
else
intel_de_rmw(display, regs.pp_ctrl, BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK,
REG_FIELD_PREP(BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK,
- DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000)));
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(seq->t11_t12, 1000) + 1));
drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
"panel power sequencer register settings: PP_ON %#x, PP_OFF %#x, PP_DIV %#x\n",
--
2.45.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list