[PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/pps: Extract msecs_to_pps_units()
Ville Syrjala
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 6 21:58:57 UTC 2024
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Replace all the hand rolled *10 stuff with something a bit
more descriptive (msecs_to_pps_units()).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
index 6946ba0004eb..5be2903c6aaf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
@@ -1462,6 +1462,12 @@ static bool pps_delays_valid(struct intel_pps_delays *delays)
delays->power_down || delays->power_cycle;
}
+static int msecs_to_pps_units(int msecs)
+{
+ /* PPS uses 100us units */
+ return msecs * 10;
+}
+
static void pps_init_delays_bios(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_pps_delays *bios)
{
@@ -1494,7 +1500,7 @@ static void pps_init_delays_vbt(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
* seems sufficient to avoid this problem.
*/
if (intel_has_quirk(display, QUIRK_INCREASE_T12_DELAY)) {
- vbt->power_cycle = max_t(u16, vbt->power_cycle, 1300 * 10);
+ vbt->power_cycle = max_t(u16, vbt->power_cycle, msecs_to_pps_units(1300));
drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
"Increasing T12 panel delay as per the quirk to %d\n",
vbt->power_cycle);
@@ -1510,13 +1516,12 @@ static void pps_init_delays_spec(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
lockdep_assert_held(&display->pps.mutex);
- /* Upper limits from eDP 1.3 spec. Note that we use the clunky units of
- * our hw here, which are all in 100usec. */
- spec->power_up = (10 + 200) * 10; /* T1+T3 */
- spec->backlight_on = 50 * 10; /* no limit for T8, use T7 instead */
- spec->backlight_off = 50 * 10; /* no limit for T9, make it symmetric with T8 */
- spec->power_down = 500 * 10; /* T10 */
- spec->power_cycle = (10 + 500) * 10; /* T11+T12 */
+ /* Upper limits from eDP 1.3 spec */
+ spec->power_up = msecs_to_pps_units(10 + 200); /* T1+T3 */
+ spec->backlight_on = msecs_to_pps_units(50); /* no limit for T8, use T7 instead */
+ spec->backlight_off = msecs_to_pps_units(50); /* no limit for T9, make it symmetric with T8 */
+ spec->power_down = msecs_to_pps_units(500); /* T10 */
+ spec->power_cycle = msecs_to_pps_units(10 + 500); /* T11+T12 */
intel_pps_dump_state(intel_dp, "spec", spec);
}
@@ -1582,7 +1587,7 @@ static void pps_init_delays(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
* HW has only a 100msec granularity for power_cycle so round it up
* accordingly.
*/
- final->power_cycle = roundup(final->power_cycle, 100 * 10);
+ final->power_cycle = roundup(final->power_cycle, msecs_to_pps_units(100));
}
static void pps_init_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool force_disable_vdd)
--
2.45.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list