✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/dmc_wl: Fixes and enablement for Xe3_LPD (rev4)

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Mon Nov 11 09:20:44 UTC 2024


On Fri, 08 Nov 2024, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com> wrote:
> Although I just realized I confused the i915 results with the Xe results
> and the full Xe run is still going...woops.  Xe BAT was fine, but if it
> turns out there's a problem with the full Xe shard run, we can deal with
> that once we see the results.

I think the CI messaging should have more clarity on what's being run.

Fi.CI.BAT vs. CI.BAT and Fi.CI.IGT vs. CI.FULL.

You just have to know "Fi" means i915 and lack of it means xe.


BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list