[PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/dp: Use HAS_DSC macro in intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc

[Nautiyal, Ankit K]

On 10/17/2024 5:43 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 04:13:37PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>> Use HAS_DSC macro to take into account platforms for which DSC is fused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index c4fdae5097ec..c47748905506 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -1766,6 +1766,9 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>   static
>>   u8 intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>   {
>> +	if (!HAS_DSC(i915))
> This is checked already earlier via intel_dp_has_dsc(), couldn't we rely
> on that instead of checking it in these lower level functions?

Sorry for replying late to this.

You are right currently we already check this long before calling this 
function.

However I am intending to use this in 
intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits which is earlier than the check 
for DSC, for that perhaps need to add a check before computing link bpp 
limits for DSC.

In any case we can avoid the HAS_DSC() check here and in corresponding 
min helper too.

Regards,

Ankit

>
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>>   	/* Max DSC Input BPC for ICL is 10 and for TGL+ is 12 */
>>   	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
>>   		return 12;
>> -- 
>> 2.45.2
>>