[PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Add macro to choose HDCP_LINE_REKEY bit

Kandpal, Suraj suraj.kandpal at intel.com
Thu Oct 10 04:17:56 UTC 2024



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 1:09 PM
> To: Atwood, Matthew S <matthew.s.atwood at intel.com>; intel-
> xe at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal at intel.com>; Atwood, Matthew S
> <matthew.s.atwood at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Add macro to choose
> HDCP_LINE_REKEY bit
> 
> On Tue, 08 Oct 2024, Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood at intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal at intel.com>
> >
> > DISPLAY_VER() >= 30 has the HDCP_LINE_REKEY bit redefined from bit 12
> > to bit 14. Create a macro to choose the correct bit based on
> > DISPLAY_VER().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 5 +++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h           | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > index ed6aa87403e2..e9b0414590ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
> > @@ -47,10 +47,11 @@ intel_hdcp_disable_hdcp_line_rekeying(struct
> intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  			intel_de_rmw(display, MTL_CHICKEN_TRANS(hdcp-
> >cpu_transcoder),
> >  				     0, HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE);
> >  		else if (IS_DISPLAY_VER_STEP(display, IP_VER(14, 1), STEP_B0,
> STEP_FOREVER) ||
> > -			 IS_DISPLAY_VER_STEP(display, IP_VER(20, 0),
> STEP_B0, STEP_FOREVER))
> > +			 IS_DISPLAY_VER_STEP(display, IP_VER(20, 0),
> STEP_B0, STEP_FOREVER) ||
> > +			 DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30)
> >  			intel_de_rmw(display,
> >  				     TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL(display, hdcp-
> >cpu_transcoder),
> > -				     0,
> TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE);
> > +				     0,
> TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE(display));
> >  	}
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index d30459f8d1cb..da65500cd0c8
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -3832,7 +3832,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> >  #define  TRANS_DDI_EDP_INPUT_B_ONOFF	(5 << 12)
> >  #define  TRANS_DDI_EDP_INPUT_C_ONOFF	(6 << 12)
> >  #define  TRANS_DDI_EDP_INPUT_D_ONOFF	(7 << 12)
> > -#define  TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE	REG_BIT(12)
> > +#define  TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE(display)
> 	(DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30 ? REG_BIT(15) : REG_BIT(12))
> 
> Do we really want to extend this style to individual bits?

I just thought this might be cleaner should we use 
TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE
And 
XE3_TRANS_DDI_HDCP_LINE_REKEY_DISABLE instead then?

Regards,
Suraj Kandpal

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> >  #define  TRANS_DDI_MST_TRANSPORT_SELECT_MASK
> 	REG_GENMASK(11, 10)
> >  #define  TRANS_DDI_MST_TRANSPORT_SELECT(trans)	\
> >  	REG_FIELD_PREP(TRANS_DDI_MST_TRANSPORT_SELECT_MASK,
> trans)
> 
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list