[PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/xe3lpd: Increase max_h max_v for PSR

Matt Roper matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Thu Oct 24 19:59:42 UTC 2024


On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 06:34:48PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
> 
> On 10/24/2024 9:25 AM, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> > Spec states that PSR max active is same as max pipe active values.
> > Now that each pipe supports 6k resolution increasing max_h and
> > max_v for PSR too.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 6 +++++-
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index 3b20325b3f6a..8981a180285e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -1451,7 +1451,11 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >   		return false;
> >   	}
> > -	if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 12) {
> > +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 30) {
> > +		psr_max_h = 6144;
> > +		psr_max_v = 4096;
> 
> As per Bspec:69885 from XE2LPD+ the max size for PSR2 is pipe active size,
> so psr_max_v should have been 4096 even earlier.
> 
> Perhaps need to change even for earlier platform.

Agreed; bspec 68858 indicates this should have been the pipe's vertical
limit (4096) on Xe2 as well.


Matt

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ankit
> 
> > +		max_bpp = 30;
> > +	} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> >   		psr_max_h = 5120;
> >   		psr_max_v = 3200;
> >   		max_bpp = 30;

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list