[PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/ptl/dp_mst: Fix slave transcoder enabling wrt. DDI function

[Luca Coelho]

On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 12:57 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:44:38PM +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 21:23 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > On PTL during modeset enabling configure the DDI function without
> > > enabling it for MST slave transcoders before programming the data and
> > > link M/N values. The DDI function gets enabled separately later in the
> > > transcoder enabling sequence.
> > > 
> > > This fixes a slave transcoder getting stuck during enabling, leading
> > > to page flip timeout errors on the corresponding pipe.
> > > 
> > > The spec requires the same programming step for ADLP+ platforms, that
> > > will be addressed separately (on those platforms the above transcoder
> > > getting stuck issue was not observed).
> > > 
> > > Bspec: 68849
> > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c    | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h    | 2 ++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 3 +++
> > >  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > index 2bd14e2134be9..069cca4b38b2e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ void intel_ddi_enable_transcoder_func(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > >   * Same as intel_ddi_enable_transcoder_func(), but it does not set the enable
> > >   * bit.
> > >   */
> > > -static void
> > > +void
> > >  intel_ddi_config_transcoder_func(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > >  				 const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > 
> > The void fits on the same line, and I think it looks better?
> 
> Ok, will change that.
> 
> > >  {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h
> > > index 6d85422bdefef..1aa2e3a190aee 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.h
> > > @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ void intel_wait_ddi_buf_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >  void intel_ddi_init(struct intel_display *display,
> > >  		    const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata);
> > >  bool intel_ddi_get_hw_state(struct intel_encoder *encoder, enum pipe *pipe);
> > > +void intel_ddi_config_transcoder_func(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > +				      const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > >  void intel_ddi_enable_transcoder_func(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > >  				      const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > >  void intel_ddi_disable_transcoder_func(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > index 1a2ff3e1cb68f..7c16406883594 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > @@ -1224,6 +1224,9 @@ static void intel_mst_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > >  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12 || !first_mst_stream)
> > >  		intel_ddi_enable_transcoder_clock(encoder, pipe_config);
> > >  
> > > +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 30 && !first_mst_stream)
> > > +		intel_ddi_config_transcoder_func(encoder, pipe_config);
> > > +
> > >  	intel_dsc_dp_pps_write(&dig_port->base, pipe_config);
> > >  	intel_ddi_set_dp_msa(pipe_config, conn_state);
> > >  }
> > 
> > I don't see the part where you changed the code to _not_ enable this,
> > since you're calling intel_ddi_config_transcoder_func() here now...
> > 
> > Did I miss something?
> 
> This only _configures_ the DDI function - which was missing so far - the
> enabling and disabling happens separately later, in
> intel_mst_enable_dp() / intel_mst_post_disable_dp() - which are done
> already as expected.

Okay, that explains it.  Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho at intel.com>

--
Cheers,
Luca.