[PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/display: move dmc snapshotting to new display snapshot
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Sep 5 16:59:22 UTC 2024
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 05:03:00PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Convert dmc error state printing to new snapshot capture/print division.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c | 5 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 39 +++++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h | 7 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 3 --
> 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c
> index a61ff0f81397..030c4f873da1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_snapshot.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include "intel_display_device.h"
> #include "intel_display_params.h"
> #include "intel_display_snapshot.h"
> +#include "intel_dmc.h"
> #include "intel_overlay.h"
>
> struct intel_display_snapshot {
> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ struct intel_display_snapshot {
> struct intel_display_runtime_info runtime_info;
> struct intel_display_params params;
> struct intel_overlay_snapshot *overlay;
> + struct intel_dmc_snapshot *dmc;
> };
>
> struct intel_display_snapshot *intel_display_snapshot_capture(struct intel_display *display)
> @@ -35,6 +37,7 @@ struct intel_display_snapshot *intel_display_snapshot_capture(struct intel_displ
> intel_display_params_copy(&snapshot->params);
>
> snapshot->overlay = intel_overlay_snapshot_capture(display);
> + snapshot->dmc = intel_dmc_snapshot_capture(display);
>
> return snapshot;
> }
> @@ -53,6 +56,7 @@ void intel_display_snapshot_print(const struct intel_display_snapshot *snapshot,
> intel_display_params_dump(&snapshot->params, display->drm->driver->name, p);
>
> intel_overlay_snapshot_print(snapshot->overlay, p);
> + intel_dmc_snapshot_print(snapshot->dmc, p);
> }
>
> void intel_display_snapshot_free(struct intel_display_snapshot *snapshot)
> @@ -63,5 +67,6 @@ void intel_display_snapshot_free(struct intel_display_snapshot *snapshot)
> intel_display_params_free(&snapshot->params);
>
> kfree(snapshot->overlay);
> + kfree(snapshot->dmc);
> kfree(snapshot);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> index 7c756d5ba2a2..d2f9684c8b0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> @@ -1184,21 +1184,44 @@ void intel_dmc_fini(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> }
> }
>
> -void intel_dmc_print_error_state(struct drm_printer *p,
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +struct intel_dmc_snapshot {
> + bool initialized;
> + bool loaded;
> + u32 version;
> +};
> +
> +struct intel_dmc_snapshot *intel_dmc_snapshot_capture(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm);
> struct intel_dmc *dmc = i915_to_dmc(i915);
> + struct intel_dmc_snapshot *snapshot;
>
> if (!HAS_DMC(i915))
> - return;
> + return NULL;
>
> - drm_printf(p, "DMC initialized: %s\n", str_yes_no(dmc));
> - drm_printf(p, "DMC loaded: %s\n",
> - str_yes_no(intel_dmc_has_payload(i915)));
> + snapshot = kzalloc(sizeof(*snapshot), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!snapshot)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + snapshot->initialized = dmc;
> + snapshot->loaded = intel_dmc_has_payload(i915);
> if (dmc)
> + snapshot->version = dmc->version;
> +
> + return snapshot;
> +}
> +
> +void intel_dmc_snapshot_print(const struct intel_dmc_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer *p)
> +{
> + if (!snapshot)
> + return;
> +
> + drm_printf(p, "DMC initialized: %s\n", str_yes_no(snapshot->initialized));
> + drm_printf(p, "DMC loaded: %s\n", str_yes_no(snapshot->loaded));
> + if (snapshot->initialized)
> drm_printf(p, "DMC fw version: %d.%d\n",
> - DMC_VERSION_MAJOR(dmc->version),
> - DMC_VERSION_MINOR(dmc->version));
> + DMC_VERSION_MAJOR(snapshot->version),
> + DMC_VERSION_MINOR(snapshot->version));
I was wondering if we really need to stash the version, but since the
print can happen later and perhaps when it is gone, let's go with the safe.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> }
>
> static int intel_dmc_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h
> index 54cff6002e31..e2186c900505 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
> enum pipe;
> struct drm_i915_private;
> struct drm_printer;
> +struct intel_display;
> +struct intel_dmc_snapshot;
>
> void intel_dmc_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> void intel_dmc_load_program(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> @@ -22,8 +24,9 @@ void intel_dmc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> void intel_dmc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> bool intel_dmc_has_payload(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> void intel_dmc_debugfs_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> -void intel_dmc_print_error_state(struct drm_printer *p,
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> +
> +struct intel_dmc_snapshot *intel_dmc_snapshot_capture(struct intel_display *display);
> +void intel_dmc_snapshot_print(const struct intel_dmc_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer *p);
>
> void assert_dmc_loaded(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index 15d57206b281..135ded17334e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>
> #include "display/intel_display_snapshot.h"
> -#include "display/intel_dmc.h"
>
> #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
> #include "gem/i915_gem_lmem.h"
> @@ -871,8 +870,6 @@ static void __err_print_to_sgl(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
>
> err_printf(m, "IOMMU enabled?: %d\n", error->iommu);
>
> - intel_dmc_print_error_state(&p, m->i915);
> -
> err_printf(m, "RPM wakelock: %s\n", str_yes_no(error->wakelock));
> err_printf(m, "PM suspended: %s\n", str_yes_no(error->suspended));
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list