[PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Fix AUX IO power enabling for eDP PSR
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Tue Sep 10 14:44:43 UTC 2024
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 02:18:47PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Panel Self Refresh on eDP requires the AUX IO power to be enabled
> whenever the output (main link) is enabled. This is required by the
> AUX_PHY_WAKE/ML_PHY_LOCK signaling initiated by the HW automatically to
> re-enable the main link after it got disabled in power saving states
> (see eDP v1.4b, sections 5.1, 6.1.3.3.1.1).
>
> The Panel Replay mode on non-eDP outputs on the other hand is only
> supported by keeping the main link active, thus not requiring the above
> AUX_PHY_WAKE/ML_PHY_LOCK signaling (eDP v1.4b, section 6.1.3.3.1.2).
> Thus enabling the AUX IO power for this case is not required either.
>
> Based on the above enable the AUX IO power only for eDP/PSR outputs.
>
> Bspec: 49274, 53370
>
> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> Fixes: b8cf5b5d266e ("drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay")
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index 00fbe9f8c03a9..b1c294236cc87 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ intel_ddi_main_link_aux_domain(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> * instead of a specific AUX_IO_<port> reference without powering up any
> * extra wells.
> */
> - if (intel_encoder_can_psr(&dig_port->base))
> + if (intel_psr_needs_aux_io_power(&dig_port->base, crtc_state))
> return intel_display_power_aux_io_domain(i915, dig_port->aux_ch);
> else if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 14 &&
> (intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(crtc_state) ||
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index b30fa067ce6e3..f2991dc4a04ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -205,6 +205,19 @@ bool intel_encoder_can_psr(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> return false;
> }
>
> +bool intel_psr_needs_aux_io_power(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + /*
> + * For PSR/PR modes only eDP requires the AUX IO power to be enabled whenever
> + * the output is enabled. For non-eDP outputs the main link is always
> + * on, hence it doesn't require the HW initiated AUX wake-up signaling used
> + * for eDP.
I honestly got confused with this sentence here, because PSR is only a eDP
feature. But yeap, we have the DP2.0 panel replay that is based out of eDP PSR,
and it looks our code is already inheriting and mixing both.
But anyway, I wonder if this aux thing here would depend on
DP_ALPM_AUX_LESS_CAP intel_alpm_aux_less_wake_supported()
instead of assuming aux always on for panel replay.
> + */
> + return intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) &&
> + intel_encoder_can_psr(encoder);
> +}
> +
> static bool psr_global_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> index 4e09c10908e4c..6eb5f15f674fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct intel_plane_state;
> (intel_dp)->psr.source_panel_replay_support)
>
> bool intel_encoder_can_psr(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> +bool intel_psr_needs_aux_io_power(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> void intel_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> --
> 2.44.2
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list