[PATCH 00/19] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series
Nautiyal, Ankit K
ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com
Thu Sep 12 11:02:07 UTC 2024
On 9/12/2024 4:35 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 06:43:30PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>> This patch series attempts to implement basic support
>> for Ultrajoiner functionality.
>>
>> Rev6:
>> -Upgrade the debugfs functionality to enable the joining of a
>> specified number of pipes.
>> -Modify the display helpers reliant on the pipe joiner mechanism
>> to use number of pipes joined, instead of joiner flag.
>> -Checkpatch fixes.
>>
>> Rev7:
>> -Use struct intel_display, minor refactoring, and rebase.
>>
>> Rev8:
>> -Address comments from Ville.
>> -Simplified debugfs for forcing joiner, and added option to disable
>> joiner.
>> -Modified the ultra/bigjoiner helpers as suggested by Ville.
>> -Split few of the bigger patches as suggested.
>>
>> Test-with: 20240911072204.22825-1-karthik.b.s at intel.com
>>
>> Ankit Nautiyal (11):
>> drm/i915/display: Simplify intel_joiner_num_pipes and its usage
>> drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc
>> drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size
>> drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in dsc helpers for slices, bpp
> I have a feeling those four at least could be merged ahead of
> time, and thus shrink what's left quite decently already.
> Granted, you probably won't have the num_pipes value passed
> in all the way from the top yet, so might have to do some
> 'joiner ? 2 : 1' here and there as a temporary measure.
>
> I think getting this stuff out of the way would help
> avoid confusion with the debugfs/compute_config changes
> to some degree at least, and might help with bisectability,
> Presumably it builds, but I'm not really convinced all the
> intermediate steps would actually work 100% correctly.
Thanks for the comments and suggestions.
Agreed, will send this as a separate patch series shortly.
>
>> drm/i915/display: Check whether platform supports joiner
> For this stuff I'd like to see a HAS_BIGJOINER() and
> HAS_UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER() like we have for most platform
> features. This also seems like good material for stuff to
> merge on its own, ahead of the rest of the more complicated
> stuff below.
Alright will make the changes accordingly, and send separately.
Thanks & Regards,
Ankit
>
>> drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes
>> drm/i915/display_debugfs: Allow force joiner only if supported
>> drm/i915/dp: Add helper to compute num pipes joined
>> drm/i915/display: Add debugfs support to avoid joiner
>> drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock
>> drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner
>>
>> Stanislav Lisovskiy (8):
>> drm/i915: Add some essential functionality for joiners
>> drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout
>> drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity
>> checks
>> drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner
>> drm/i915/display: Percolate ultrajoiner info to get_joiner_config
>> drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC
>> drm/i915: Add new abstraction layer to handle pipe order for different
>> joiners
>> drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes for ultrajoiner
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 19 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 423 +++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 17 +-
>> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 84 +++-
>> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 138 ++++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 14 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 54 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 30 +-
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h | 3 +
>> 12 files changed, 646 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.45.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list