[PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Add delay to let engine resumes properly

Krzysztof Karas krzysztof.karas at intel.com
Tue Apr 29 11:51:09 UTC 2025


Hi Nitin,

[...]

> > > +		if (wait_for_atomic((!stop_ring(engine) == 0), 20)) {
> > >  			drm_err(&engine->i915->drm,
> > >  				"failed to set %s head to zero "
> > >  				"ctl %08x head %08x tail %08x start %08x\n",
> > 
> > I am wondering if xcs_resume() calling stop_ring() too would benefit from having
> > this timeout on hand as well. That would require moving
> > wait_for_atomic((!stop_ring(engine) == 0), 20) along with your comment to a
> > separate wrapper function.
> > What do you think?
> 
> In xcs_resume(), there is no need for a timeout for stop_ring(), as we have not encountered any issues/errors in xcs_resume().
> So, I think, currently there is no need for a separate wrapper function.
In that case, I do not have any more concerns:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas at intel.com>

Best Regards,
Krzysztof


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list