✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915/dmc_wl: Track INITIATE_PM_DMD_REQ for DC5
Gustavo Sousa
gustavo.sousa at intel.com
Tue Feb 4 11:37:04 UTC 2025
Quoting Patchwork (2025-02-04 01:07:43-03:00)
>== Series Details ==
>
>Series: drm/i915/dmc_wl: Track INITIATE_PM_DMD_REQ for DC5
>URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/144278/
>State : failure
>
>== Summary ==
>
>CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16058_full -> Patchwork_144278v1_full
>====================================================
>
>Summary
>-------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_144278v1_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_144278v1_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
>Participating hosts (11 -> 11)
>------------------------------
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
>Possible new issues
>-------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_144278v1_full:
>
>### IGT changes ###
>
>#### Possible regressions ####
Hi, CI Team.
>
> * igt at gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-mixed-process at vebox:
> - shard-mtlp: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16058/shard-mtlp-4/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-mixed-process@vebox.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144278v1/shard-mtlp-7/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-mixed-process@vebox.html
This should probably be mapped to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13193
>
> * igt at i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend:
> - shard-rkl: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16058/shard-rkl-3/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_144278v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend.html
>
This patch simply adds an offset to a table and should not affect
platforms with display version < 30, so none of the above failures are
related to this patch.
--
Gustavo Sousa
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list