[REGRESSSION] on linux-next (next-20250509)

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Thu Jul 3 14:43:41 UTC 2025


Hi,

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 03:07:51PM +0200, Luke Jones wrote:
>On Wed, 28 May 2025, at 12:08 PM, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
>> Hello Luke,
>>
>> Hope you are doing well. I am Chaitanya from the linux graphics team in Intel.
>>
>> This mail is regarding a regression we are seeing in our CI runs[1] on
>> linux-next repository.
>
>Can you tell me if the fix here was included?
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/5/24/152
>
>I could change to:
>static void asus_s2idle_check_register(void)
>{
>    // Only register for Ally devices
>    if (dmi_check_system(asus_rog_ally_device)) {
>        if (acpi_register_lps0_dev(&asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops))
>            pr_warn("failed to register LPS0 sleep handler in asus-wmi\n");
>    }
>}
>
>but I don't really understand what is happening here. The inner lps0 functions won't run unless use_ally_mcu_hack is set.
>
>I will do my best to fix but I need to understand what happened a bit better.

Any updates here? This is basically killing our tests for drm-xe-fixes
we are submitting to 6.16 since it taints the kernel. If we can't fix,
maybe it's already late enough in RCs that we should need a revert?

FWIW, for 6.17 we have a branch on the side we also merge before testing
and we've been including the change above to stop it from killing the
rest of our CI:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/commit/e9d0926aa1c6afcc920013c39d5bd6dd85f581fb

Lucas De Marchi


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list