[PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/dp: Limit m/n ratio to 10 for DP SST
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Mon Jul 21 11:41:54 UTC 2025
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 02:45:22PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> The hardware cannot support DisplayPort configurations where the
> ceiling of the Link M/Link N ratio exceeds 10. This limitation has
> always existed, but it typically wasn't encountered without the use of
> joiners and DSC.
>
> With higher resolutions and combinations involving joiners and DSC,
> this constraint can now be hit in certain scenarios.
>
> Introduce a check during link rate configuration to ensure
> the computed M/N ratio does not exceed the hardware limit. If no valid
> link rate satisfies this constraint, the mode will be rejected.
>
> Note: This change applies the check only for SST. Support for MST will
> be added in a subsequent commit.
>
> v2:
> -Move the M/N ratio check to the link rate configuration phase instead
> of during M/N computation. (Ville)
> -Prune modes that cannot be supported even with highest link rate due to
> M/N ratio restriction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 3 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 671491a2a3b6..f32a4956c926 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2506,7 +2506,6 @@ static void compute_m_n(u32 *ret_m, u32 *ret_n,
> intel_reduce_m_n_ratio(ret_m, ret_n);
> }
>
> -static
> void intel_display_get_link_m_n(u32 *link_m, u32 *link_n,
> u32 pixel_clock,
> u32 link_clock)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> index 37e2ab301a80..bfa3db219b9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> @@ -559,5 +559,8 @@ bool assert_port_valid(struct intel_display *display, enum port port);
>
> bool intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(struct intel_display *display);
> int intel_crtc_num_joined_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +void intel_display_get_link_m_n(u32 *link_m, u32 *link_n,
> + u32 pixel_clock,
> + u32 link_clock);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 54d88f24b689..4245dd65b2af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1407,6 +1407,28 @@ bool intel_dp_has_dsc(const struct intel_connector *connector)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static int
> +intel_dp_get_max_m_n_ratio(void)
> +{
> + return 10;
> +}
> +
> +static bool
> +intel_dp_can_support_m_n(int pixel_clock,
> + int link_rate)
> +{
> + int max_m_n_ratio = intel_dp_get_max_m_n_ratio();
> + u32 link_m, link_n;
> + int m_n_ratio;
> +
> + intel_display_get_link_m_n(&link_m, &link_n,
> + pixel_clock, link_rate);
> +
> + m_n_ratio = DIV_ROUND_UP(link_m, link_n);
> +
> + return m_n_ratio <= max_m_n_ratio;
> +}
> +
> static enum drm_mode_status
> intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> @@ -1518,6 +1540,9 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> if (status != MODE_OK)
> return status;
>
> + if (!intel_dp_can_support_m_n(target_clock, max_rate))
> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> +
> return intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(display, mode, num_joined_pipes);
> }
>
> @@ -1789,6 +1814,9 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> link_rate > limits->max_rate)
> continue;
>
> + if (!intel_dp_can_support_m_n(clock, link_rate))
> + continue;
Could this limit be set in limits->min_rate, computed already in
intel_dp_compute_config_limits()? (And fail already there if this is
bigger than limits->max_rate.)
> +
> for (lane_count = limits->min_lane_count;
> lane_count <= limits->max_lane_count;
> lane_count <<= 1) {
> @@ -1796,7 +1824,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> link_rate,
> lane_count);
>
> -
> if (mode_rate <= link_avail) {
> pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
> pipe_config->pipe_bpp = bpp;
> @@ -1983,6 +2010,10 @@ static int dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> if (link_rate < limits->min_rate || link_rate > limits->max_rate)
> continue;
>
> + if (!intel_dp_can_support_m_n(adjusted_mode->clock,
> + link_rate))
> + continue;
> +
> for (lane_count = limits->min_lane_count;
> lane_count <= limits->max_lane_count;
> lane_count <<= 1) {
> --
> 2.45.2
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list